green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“the state bears the burden of justifying a restriction on speech.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. 119 Vote No! Committee
the state bears the burden of justifying a restriction on speech.
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald Duhe v. Little Rock Arkansas, City of
See Excalibur Grp., Inc. v. City of Minneapolis , 116 F.3d 1216 , 1223 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 522 U.S. 1077 , 118 S.Ct. 855 , 139 L.Ed.2d 755 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Evers
(2×)
See People v. Hines, 15 Cal. 4th 997 , 64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 594 , 938 P. 2d 388, 420 (1997) (holding that pursuant to amendment of *444 California Constitution, "relevant evidence that is illegally obtained under California law is nonetheless admissible, so long as federal law does not bar its admission"), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1077 , 118 S.Ct. 855 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 755 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weaver v. Boyles
See Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Va., 122 F.3d 192, 202 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1077 , 118 S.Ct. 856 , 139 L.Ed.2d 756 (1998). “[T]he fundamental and appropriate question to ask is whether the injury alleged by the federal plaintiff resulted from the state court judgment itself or is distinct from that judgment.” Garry v. Geils, 82 F.3d 1362, 1365 (7th Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp.
See Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue, 132 Wn.2d 103, 142 , 937 P.2d 154 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 856 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cote
See, e.g., State v. Sebastian, 243 Conn. 115, 125-55 , 701 A.2d 13 (1997) (considering defendant's claim that two federal acts preempted state criminal law), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 856 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sprague v. Sysco Corp.
See, e.g., Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue, 132 Wn.2d 103, 142 , 937 P.2d 154 (1997) (applying an abuse of discretion standard to a trial court’s decision to deny leave to amend a complaint under CR 15(a)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1077 , 139 L.
City of Cleveland
v.
Nation of Islam
v.
Nation of Islam
No. 97-814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Washington Supreme Court (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.