Alaska v. United States, 522 U.S. 1108 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Alaska v. United States, 522 U.S. 1108 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
105 citation events (67 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bob Evans Farms, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross (ca7, 1998-12-17) · Strongest negative: Richey v. Tyson (alsd, 2000-11-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Richey v. Tyson
S.D. Ala. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., Clifton v. Federal Election Commission, 114 F.3d 1309, 1312 (1st Cir.1997)(noting that Supreme Court cases hint at permissible election finance restrictions adversely affecting issue advocacy), *1310 cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1108 , 118 S.Ct. 1036 , 140 L.Ed.2d 103 (1998).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bob Evans Farms, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
7th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
See Holly Farms, 517 U.S. at 397-99 , 116 S.Ct. 1396 (applying Chevron to Board adjudication); accord Mid-America Care Foundation v. NLRB, 148 F.3d 638 (6th Cir.1998); NLRB v. Webcor Packaging, Inc., 118 F.3d 1115, 1119 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118-S.Ct. 1035, 140 L.Ed.2d 102 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Franklin Savings Corp. v. United States (2×)
Fed. Cl. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alaska v. United States, 35 Fed.Cl. 685, 704 (1996), aff'd, 119 F.3d 16 , 1997 WL 382032 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1108 , 118 S.Ct. 1035 , 140 L.Ed.2d 102 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Branstad v. Glickman (2×)
N.D. Iowa · 2000 · signal: accord · confidence high
Although “the APA provides that judicial review of agency action is available only ‘if there is no other adequate remedy in a court,’ ” James v. Caldera, 159 F.3d 573, 578-79 (Fed.Cir.1998) (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 704 , and considering whether a suit under the Tucker Act in the Court of Federal Claims provided an adequate remedy precluding APA review); accord Newton County Wildlife Ass’n v. United States Forest Serv., 113 F.3d 110, 114 (8th Cir.1997) (finding that, under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), the APA stated the “scope of review,” but the FIFRA stated the mechanism fo…
examined Cited "see, e.g." Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (3×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Beals v. Kiewit Pacific Co., Inc., 114 F.3d 892 (9th Cir.1997), cert. den. 522 U.S. 1108 , 118 S.Ct. 1036 , 140 L.Ed.2d 102 (1998); Antol v. Esposto, 100 F.3d 1111 (3rd Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arrow Electric Company, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Board's interpretation of the NLRA is subject to the Chevron test. 1 See Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB, 517 U.S. 392, 398-99 , 116 S.Ct. 1396 , 134 L.Ed.2d 593 (1996); see also NLRB v. Webcor Packaging, Inc., 118 F.3d 1115, 1119 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1035 , 140 L.Ed.2d 102 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alaska
v.
United States
No. 97-750.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
522 U.S. 1108
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.