Dist. Attorney of Bucks Cnty. v. Smith, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Dist. Attorney of Bucks Cnty. v. Smith, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2004 · …the running of the statute of limitations is a factor supporting the discretionary granting of an extension of time to make service ⚠ not in text
64 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing A Registered Trademark of Guess?, Inc. (ca9, 2004-04-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing A Registered Trademark of Guess?, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the running of the statute of limitations is a factor supporting the discretionary granting of an extension of time to make service
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. 2,164 Watches, More Or Less, Bearing A Registered Trademark Of Guess?, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the running of the statute of limitations is a factor supporting the discretionary granting of an extension of time to make service
discussed Cited "see" Hamidu v. Sands
N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
The rule also authorizes a second, unspecified discretionary basis for extension ‘even if there is no good cause shown’ (1993 Advisory Comm Note, Fed Rules Civ Pro, rule 4[m]; see, Boley v Kaymark, 123 F3d 756, 758 [3d Cir], cert denied 522 US 1109 ).
cited Cited "see" Doe, SORB No. 380316 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Mass. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 , 1110-1111 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 (1998); Doe v. Pataki, 3 F. Supp. 2d 456, 471 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
discussed Cited "see" Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer
NY · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
The rule also authorizes a second, unspecified discretionary basis for extension “even if there is no good cause shown” (1993 Advisory Comm Note, Fed Rules Civ Pro, rule 4 [m]; see, Boley v Kaymark, 123 F3d 756, 758 [3d Cir], cert denied 522 US 1109 ).
discussed Cited "see" Helman v. State
Del. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally E.B. v. Verniero, 3d Cir., 119 F.3d 1077, 1082-83 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (describing sex offender registration and community notification components of New Jersey’s Megan’s Law scheme).
discussed Cited "see" Biagro Western Sales, Inc. v. Helena Chemical Co.
E.D. Cal. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP, 112 F.3d, 1146, 1153 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (quoting Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. BP Chemicals, Ltd., 78 F.3d 1575, 1578 (Fed.Cir.1996)).
discussed Cited "see" Lile v. Simmons
D. Kan. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.B. v. Ver niero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir.1997) (community registration), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); *1275 Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1 , 662 A.2d 367 (1995) (same); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 486 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) (parole revocation).
cited Cited "see" Harris v. Johnson
Miss. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Estate of Johnson, 705 So.2d 819, 823 (Miss.1996), cert. denied, Harris v. Johnson, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 104 (1998).
cited Cited "see" In Re Estate of Johnson
Miss. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Estate of Johnson, 705 So.2d 819, 823 (Miss.1996), cert. denied, Harris v. Johnson, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 104 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Misiorski
Conn. · 1999 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Constitutional privacy interests are implicated . . . because . . . [t]he damage to [citizens’] reputations resulting from [disclosure] stigmatizes them as currently dangerous sex offenders, can harm their earning capacities, and can cause them to be objects of derision in the community.” Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board, 428 Mass. 90 , 101 n.12, 697 N.E.2d 512 (1998); accord E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1105-1106 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S. Ct. 1039 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" Robert M. Harris v. Claud L. Johnson
Miss. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Estate of Johnson, 705 So. 2d 819, 823 (Miss. 1996), cert. denied, Harris v. Johnson, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S. Ct. 1037 , 140 L.Ed.2d 104 (1998).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Doe v. District Attorney
Me. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1104 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mannatech, Inc. v. Glycobiotics International, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 1582-83 ; see also CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP., 112 F.3d 1146, 1158 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harris v. New York State Department of Health
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
And one circuit court has described the principle as “a combination of the abstention and res judicata doctrines-” U.S. v. Owens, 54 F.3d 271, 274 (6th Cir.) cert. dismissed, 516 U.S. 983 , 116 S.Ct. 492 , 133 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); see also E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1091 (3d Cir.1997) (referring to “Rooker-Feldman abstention”), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
District Attorney of Bucks County
v.
Smith
No. 97-844.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
522 U.S. 1109
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.