green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jackson v. New York State
LRL Properties v. Portage Metro Housing Authority, 55 F.3d 1097 , 1105 n. 3 (6th Cir.1995); McGregor v. Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors, 3 F.3d 850 , 866 n. 27 (5th Cir.1993); Oyler v. Finney, 870 F.Supp. 1018, 1023 (D.Kan.1994) (citing cases), aff'd, 52 F.3d 338 , 1995 WL 225270 (10th Cir.1995); but see Gutowsky v. County of Placer, 108 F.3d 256, 259 (9th Cir.) (applying doctrine to a § 1983 case), *88 cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997); Redding v. Anne Arundel County, 996 F.Supp. 488, 490-91 (D.Md.1998) (suggesting doctrine applies); Bremille…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
Bd. of Supervisors, 3 F.3d 850 , 866 n. 27 (5th Cir.1993); Oyler v. Finney, 870 F.Supp. 1018, 1023 (D.Kan.1994) (citing eases), aff'd, 52 F.3d 338 , 1995 WL 225270 (10th Cir.1995); but see Gutowsky v. County of Placer, 108 F.3d 256, 259 (9th Cir.) (applying doctrine to section 1983 case), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997); Redding v. Anne Arundel County, 996 F.Supp. 488, 490-91 (D.Md.1998) (suggesting doctrine applies); Bremiller v. Cleveland Psychiatric Inst., 879 F.Supp. 782, 790 (N.D.Ohio 1995) (applying doctrine).
cited
Cited "see"
MT Technology Enterprises, LLC v. Nolte (In re Nolte)
See Pahlavi v. Ansari (In re Ansari), 113 F.3d 17, 19 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
KGB International, Inc. v. Watford (In Re Watford)
See In re Ansari, 113 F.3d 17, 20 (4th Cir.1997)(“[A] ‘defalcation’ for purposes of this statute does not have to rise to the level of ‘fraud,’ ‘embezzlement,’ or even ‘misappropriation.’ ”) (citations omitted, brackets in original), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Acacia Life Insurance
Accord, e.g., Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 926 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Hong v. Children's Memorial Hospital, 936 F.2d 967, 970-971 (7th Cir.1991); Griffin *574 v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., 883 F.2d 940, 943 (11th Cir.1989). 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Oakland County Circuit Court
See Mumford v. Basinski, 105 F.3d 268 [264] (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997); see also Foster v. Walsh, 864 F.2d 416, 418 (6th Cir.1988)(holding that an Ohio municipal court could not be sued under § 1983 because it was not a “person” as § 1983 uses that term)... the Supreme Court has taken apart the foundation of our decision in Mumford since it was decided.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane Irving
See Mumford v. Basinski, 105 F.3d 264, 268 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997); see also Foster v. Walsh, 864 F.2d 416, 418 (6th Cir.1988) (holding that an Ohio municipal court could not be sued under § 1983 because it was not a “person” as § 1983 uses that term).
cited
Cited "see"
Ackah v. Hershey Foods Corp.
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 925 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. U.S. Healthcare
Furthermore, State law claims arising out of “any administrative determination relating to the plan or the extent of its benefits” are barred by the preemption provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( 29 USC § 1001 et seq. [ERISA]; see, Tufino v New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council & Hotel Assns., 223 AD2d 245, 250 ; see, Shea v Esensten, 107 F3d 625, 627 [8th Cir], cert denied 522 US 914), which recite that it shall “supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan” ( 29 USC § 1144 [a]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchinson (Godlove) v. Pfeil
See Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Hutchinson v. Pfeil, No. 98-5043, 1999 WL 1015557 (10th Cir. Nov.9, 1999) (unpublished). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dianne L. Shea v. Sidney Esensten
See Shea v. Esensten, 107 F.3d 625 (8th Cir.) (Shea I), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914, 118 S.Ct. 297 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Dianne L. Shea v. Sidney Esensten
See Shea v. Esensten, 107 F.3d 625 (8th Cir.) (Shea I), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Wanda Sowards v. Loudon County, Tennessee and Timothy Guider, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Loudon County, Tennessee
See Mumford v. Basinski, 105 F.3d 264, 271 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoard v. Sizemore
See Mumford v. Basinski, 105 F.3d 264, 271 (6th Cir.) (“[T]he unique duties of a particular office holder are typically fact driven.” However, the “characterization of the position’s general or specific duties as nonpolitical or political is a question of law.”) (citing McCloud v. Testa, 97 F.3d 1536, 1546 (6th Cir.1996)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanders v. International Society for Performance Improvement
See Shea v. Esensten, 107 F.3d 625 , 628 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 297 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997) (estate representative has standing to assert deceased’s breach of fiduciary duty claim under ERISA); cf. Yarde v. Pan American Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
WILLARD RUSHING and PATRICIA RUSHING v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
See Webb, denied, 522 U.S. 914 (1997); Buttry v. General 139 F.3d at 536 ; Figgie, 23 F.3d at 1269-70.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NORTHWEST OHIO
See, e.g., Shea v. Esensten, 107 F.3d 625 , 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 297 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997) (health maintenance organization had fiduciary duty to disclose financial incentive structure intended to reward primary care physicians who minimized referrals to specialists); Anweiler v. American Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collins v. TRL, INC.
Likewise, the PHRA makes it unlawful for an employer “to discriminate in any manner against any individual because such individual has opposed any practice forbidden by this act, or because such individual has made a charge ... under this act.” 43 P.S. § 955(d); see also Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 919-20 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997) The law provides that to establish a prima facie case of retaliation the plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) he was engaged in protected activity; (2) the employer took an adverse employment actio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neuma, Inc. v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.
See also Shea v. Esensten, 107 F.3d 625 , 629 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 297 , 139 L.Ed.2d 229 (1997) (health maintenance organization had fiduciary duty to disclose financial incentive structure intended to reward primary care physicians who minimized referrals to specialists).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lidwell v. University Park Nursing Care Center
See also Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913 , 920 and 920 n. 2 (3d Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997) (applying burden-shifting analysis to retaliation claim); Clarkson v. Penna.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
See also Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562, 565 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Gray v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al., 937 F.Supp. 153, 156 (D.R.I.1996); Doe v. Marsh, et al., 899 F.Supp. 933, 934 (N.D.N.Y.1995); United States v. Premises Known as 281 Syosset Woodbury Road, 862 F.Supp. 847, 851 (E.D.N.Y.1994), aff'd, 71 F.3d 1067 (2d Cir.1995); Schwartz v. Marketing Publishing Company, 153 F.R.D. 16, 22 (D.Conn.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randall v. Buena Vista County Hospital
Louis Convention & Visitors Comm’n, 154 F.3d at 861 ; see also Read v. Medical X-Ray Ctr., P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 545 (8th Cir.1997) (stating one element of the claim to be that the defendant’s “allegedly anticompetitive conduct was ‘a material cause’ of [the plaintiffs] injury”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shers
v.
City and County of San Francisco
v.
City and County of San Francisco
No. 97-221.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1997.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.