green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
13.3 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 3 distinct cases ·
"It is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense. Rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to a lesser-included offense for the factfinder to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"Lefkowitz I "
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goad, Joshua Lee
it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense. rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to a lesser-included offense for the factfinder to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goad, Joshua Lee
it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense. rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to a lesser-included offense for the factfinder to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Burton v. Bock
o warrant habeas relief, jury instructions must not only be erroneous, but also, taken as a whole, so inform that they rendered the entire trial fundamentally unfair.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard J. Campos v. State of Indiana
See Davis, 217 N.E.3d at 1233 (quoting White, 497 N.E.2d at 905 ). [8] Nevertheless, “‘defendants who can show that they were coerced or misled into pleading guilty by the judge, prosecutor or defense counsel will present colorable claims for relief.’” Id. (quoting State v. Moore, 678 N.E.2d 1258, 1266 (Ind. 1997), reh’g denied, cert denied, 523 U.S. 1079 (1998)).
cited
Cited "see"
Tyre Bradbury v. State of Indiana
See State v. Moore, 678 N.E.2d 1258, 1261 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 (1998). [16] The judgment of the postconviction court is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.
cited
Cited "see"
Laura Juarez v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Vernon Hawkins v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Vernon Hawkins v. State
See Skinner v. State , 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Hale Austin v. State of Tennessee
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis v. State
(2×)
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Bradford v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cer t. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
John Tejeda v. State
See Skinner v. State , 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United, States v. Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358, 1364 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Hanks, Lincoln v. v. the State of Texas
See Skinner v. State , 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert. denied , 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Licon v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cer t. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Hanks v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maurice A. Mason v. Betty Mitchell
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 848 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998); cf. Scott v. Mitchell, 209 F.3d 854, 881 (6th Cir.) (“Without effective research into the available mitigating testimony, of course, it would be impossible for the lawyers to have made an informed decision either way.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1021 , 121 S.Ct. 588 , 148 L.Ed.2d 503 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Austin
(2×)
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Arzaga v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cer t. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. State
See Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gousie
See United States v. Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358, 1363 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 (1997) (seizure of file cabinets permitted); United States v. Slocum, 708 F.2d 587, 605-06 (11th Cir. 1983) (seizure of file folder commingling innocent and incriminating material); United States v. Johnson, 709 F.2d 515, 516 (8th Cir. 1983) (officers removed safe to be opened at the station after its owner refused to divulge the combination).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reaves
See United States v. Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358, 1364 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Richard Hale Austin
See Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S. Ct. 1526 and 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S. Ct. 1547 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Monegan v. State
See State v. Moore, 678 N.E.2d 1258, 1261 (Ind.1997) (applying Strickland), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1528 , 140 L.Ed.2d 678 (1998); Jackson v. State, 683 N.E.2d 560, 562 (Ind.1997) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Erickson v. Albuquerque Public Schools
See United States v. Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358, 1364 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DeAndre Dwight Joseph A/K/A Joseph DeAndre A/K/A DeAndre Dwight Parks A/K/A/ DeAndre Parks A/K/A DeAndre Joseph A/K/A DeAndra Dwight Joseph v. State
See also Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), cert.denied, 523 U.S. 1079 (1998) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodge v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See, e.g., Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 849 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998), and cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1088 , 118 S.Ct. 1547 , 140 L.Ed.2d 695 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gall
(2×)
For various policy reasons, the removal of a sealed container, which may amount to an "over-seizure," is not only authorized but preferred in limited circumstances, including where "the sorting out of the described items from the intermingled undescribed items would take so long that it is less intrusive merely to take that entire group of items to another location and do the sorting there." LaFave, supra, at § 4.11(a), p. 686; see also United States v. Hargus, 128 F.3d 1358, 1363 (10th Cir.1997) (seizure of filing cabinets for later search off-site reasonable where impractical to sift throug…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens v. State
See also Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843, 846-47 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1079 , 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998).
Agostino
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-1585.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.