green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Frazier
(2×)
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 468 (8th Cir.1997) (affirming attribution of entire conspiracy’s drug distribution activities where defendants were “central figures” in the conspiracy), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Henry Frazier, Also Known as Towman, Also Known as Tow, Also Known as Phe, Also Known as Daddy, Also Known as Blue, Also Known as Reuben Matthews, United States of America v. Darren Thomas, Also Known as Dt, United States of America v. Joe Robinson, United States of America v. Phelix T. Frazier, Also Known as Little Phe, Also Known as Phe Phe
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 468 (8th Cir.1997) (affirming attribution of entire conspiracy's drug distribution activities where defendants were "central figures" in the conspiracy), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Henry Frazier, Also Known as Towman, Also Known as Tow, Also Known as Phe, Also Known as Daddy, Also Known as Blue, Also Known as Reuben Matthews, United States of America v. Darren Thomas, Also Known as Dt, United States of America v. Joe Robinson, United States of America v. Phelix T. Frazier, Also Known as Little Phe, Also Known as Phe Phe
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 468 (8th Cir. 1997) (affirming attribution of entire conspiracy's drug distribution activities where defendants were "central figures" in the conspiracy), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phelix Frazier
(2×)
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 468 (8th Cir.1997) (affirming attribution of entire conspiracy’s drug distribution activities where defendants were “central figures” in the conspiracy), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Crank
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 467 (8th Cir. 1997) (reviewing court is particularly hesitant to find clear error in district court’s drug- quantity findings where those findings are based on determinations of witness credibility), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 906 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest Crank
See United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 467 (8th Cir. 1997) (reviewing court is particularly hesitant to find clear error in district court's drug- quantity findings where those findings are based on determinations of witness credibility), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 906 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Perry v. State
See State v. Perry, 954 S.W.2d 554 (Mo.App.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2062 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ashby
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 , 667–69 (2d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S. Ct. 2063 , 141 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hirsch v. City of N.Y.
While "that [affect] need not be great," United States v. Barton , 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir. 1981) ; see also United States v. Miller , 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997), cert. denied , 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998) (concluding de minimis effect on interstate commerce is sufficient under RICO), Plaintiff has not alleged that there was any effect on interstate or foreign commerce here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Praddy
See, e.g., United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2, 15 (2d Cir.1979) (jury is entitled to believe a witness “in whole or in part”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1082 , 100 S.Ct. 1037 , 62 L.Ed.2d 767 (1980). “[WJhere there are conflicts in the testimony, we must defer to the jury’s resolution of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses.” United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641, 676 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Williams
United States v. Mastrangelo, 693 F.2d 269, 272-73 (2d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1204 , 104 S.Ct. 2385 , 81 L.Ed.2d 343 (1984); see also United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641, 667-68 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998); United States v. Thai 29 F.3d 785, 814 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 977 , 115 S.Ct. 456 , 130 L.Ed.2d 364 (1994); United States v. Aguiar, 975 F.2d 45, 47 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784, 788-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 918 , 105 S.Ct. 297 , 83 L.Ed.2d 232 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Osuna-Zepeda
Id.; see also United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 464-65 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , and cert. denied, 524 U.S. 906 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Osuna-Zepeda
(2×)
Id.; see also United States v. Padilla-Pena, 129 F.3d 457, 464-65 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 141 , and cert. denied, 524 U.S. 906 , 118 S.Ct. 2064 , 141 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cadle Co. v. Flanagan
With respect to the sufficiency of an interstate commerce nexus under RICO, the Second Circuit has noted that, “[i]n determining what connections with interstate commerce must be proven ... to establish a violation of § 1962, the courts have ruled that the impact need not be great.” United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir.1981); see also United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998) (concluding de minimis effect on interstate commerce is sufficient under RICO); United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47 (1st Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Best
The government’s proof need not exclude every possible hypothesis of innocence, see, e.g., United States v. Desimone, 119 F.3d at 223 ; United States v. Malpeso, 115 F.3d 155, 164 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 951 , 118 S.Ct. 2366 , 141 L.Ed.2d 735 (1998), and where there are conflicts in the testimony, we defer “to the jury’s determination of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, and to the jury’s choice of the competing inferences that can be drawn from the evidence.” United States v. Morrison, 153 F.3d 34, 49 (2d Cir.1998); see, e.g., United Stat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salemme
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641, 664 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 905 , 118 S.Ct. 2063 , 141 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998) (probable cause); United States v. Muldoon, 931 F.2d 282, 286 (4th Cir.1991) (probable cause); United States v. Guerra-Marez, 928 F.2d 665, 670-71 (5th Cir.1991) (necessity); United States v. Jackson, 65 F.3d 631, 635-36 (7th Cir.), vacated on other grounds sub nom., Lamb v. United States, 516 U.S. 1156 , 116 S.Ct. 1038 , 134 L.Ed.2d 186 (1996) (probable cause); Falls, 34 F.3d at 681 (probable cause); Aviles, 170 F.3d at 868-69 (necessity); United States v. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kucera
v.
United Nebraska Bank
v.
United Nebraska Bank
No. 97-1647.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1998.
Published
Ct. App. Neb. Certiorari denied.