green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Winfield v. United States
See United States v. Williams, 139 F.3d 896 (4th Cir. 1998) (table), cert. denied 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 755 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Arthur Gonzales
See United States v. Brito, 136 F.3d 397 (5th Cir.) (holding that, where a juror stated in an affidavit that her verdict was “coerced” by other jurors and that the jurors impermissibly discussed punishment and appellate rights, the testimony was inadmissible on a motion for new trial absent anything to suggest that the coercion and information was brought to the jury’s attention by an outside source), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Gene Reynolds
See United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407 (11th Cir.)(stating that a § 922 offense is a strict liability offense and a defendant’s state of mind is generally irrelevant), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Gene Reynolds
See United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407 (11th Cir.)(stating that a §922 offense is a strict liability offense and a defendant’s state of mind is generally irrelevant), cert. 7 denied, 524 U.S. 962 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Strickland
See, e.g., United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cross
See, e.g., United States v. Funches, 135 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 962 , 118 S.Ct. 2389 , 141 L.Ed.2d 754 (1998); Rector, 111 F.3d at 505-07 ; United States v. Caron, 64 F.3d 713, 714-17 (1st Cir.1995), adhered to in relevant part on rehearing, 77 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1996); Etheridge, 932 F.2d at 320-22 (rejecting application of defense to § 922 where defendant claimed to rely on advice of state trial judge); United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 466-67 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Hurst, 951 F.2d 1490, 1499 (6th Cir.1991) (holding entrapment by estoppel unavailab…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Palomo
v.
Territory of Guam
v.
Territory of Guam
No. 97-9279.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1998.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.