green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.0 score
“emporal connection between exposure to chemicals and an onset of symptoms, standing alone, is entitled to little weight in determining causation.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Delores F. Turner Russell Turner v. Iowa Fire Equipment Company, an Iowa Corporation, - Iowa Fire Equipment Company, Third Party v. Kidde-Fenwal, Inc. Third Party
See Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F.3d 257, 262-63 (4th Cir. 1999) (collecting cases); but see Moore v. Ashland Chem., Inc., 151 F.3d 269, 277-79 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 (1999) (concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding causation opinion based on differential diagnosis).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Delores Turner etc. v. Iowa Fire Equipment
See Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F.3d 257, 262-63 (4th Cir.1999) (collecting cases); but see Moore v. Ashland Chem., Inc., 151 F.3d 269, 277-79 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 , 119 S.Ct. 1454 , 143 L.Ed.2d 541 (1999) (concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding causation opinion based on differential diagnosis).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Flt Training Intl v. FAA
all rules which interpret the underlying statute must be binding because they set forth what the agency believes is congressional intent
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Osmer v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
emporal connection between exposure to chemicals and an onset of symptoms, standing alone, is entitled to little weight in determining causation.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Musgrove v. Hanifin
Cal. 20 Aug. 28, 2015) (citing Valley Engineers, Inc., 158 F.3d at 1056 , cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 21 (1999)) and Ortiz–Rivera v. Municipal Government of Toa Alta, 214 F.R.D. 51, 57 (D.P.R.2003) 22 (disobedience of court orders in and of itself constitutes extreme misconduct and warrants 23 dismissal)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelvin Knight
See United States v. Ryan, 153 F.3d 708, 711 (8th Cir.1998), cert, denied, 526 U.S. 1064 , 119 S.Ct. 1454 , 143 L.Ed.2d 541 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelvin Knight
See United States v. Ryan, 153 F.3d 708, 711 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Moore, Ii, Also Known as Antoine Petroye Roberts
See United States v. Ryan, 153 F.3d 708, 713 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 , 119 S.Ct. 1454 , 143 L.Ed.2d 541 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sampson
Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-94 , 113 S.Ct. at 2796-97 ; see also Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc., 151 F.3d 269, 275 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc), cert. denied 526 U.S. 1064 , 119 S.Ct. 1454 , 143 L.Ed.2d 541 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christian v. Gray
See also Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 34-38 (2d ed.2000), comparing Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc., 151 F.3d 269 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 , 119 S.Ct. 1454 , 143 L.Ed.2d 541 (1999), and Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc., 167 F.3d 146 (3rd Cir.1999). 19 . ipse dixit — “He himself said it; a bare assertion resting on the authority of an individual.” Black's Law Dictionary, 961 (4th ed.1951). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. Holder
(2×)
See United States v. Wadlington, 233 F.3d 1067, 1077 (8th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Ryan, 153 F.3d 708, 711 (8th Cir. 1998)(applying the same standard to denial of motion for new trial based on Brady violation allegations), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen
See United States v. Wadlington, 233 F.3d 1067, 1077 (8th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Ryan, 153 F.3d 708, 711 (8th Cir. 1998)(applying the same standard to denial of motion for new trial based on Brady violation allegations), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1064 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martinez
v.
Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District
v.
Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District
No. 98-7809.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
526 U.S. 1064
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · E.D. Louisiana (1)
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certio-rari granted limited to the following question: “Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to elect self-representation on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction?”