In re Stone, 528 U.S. 1018 (1999). · Go Syfert
In re Stone, 528 U.S. 1018 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Herrera v. United States (nyed, 2001-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Herrera v. United States (2×) also: Cited "see"
E.D.N.Y · 2001 · confidence medium
Stat. Ann. § 2C:44 3e, unconstitutional insofar as it provides for extended term of imprisonment increasing maximum possible penalty by 10 years, on basis of proof by preponderance of evidence rather than proof beyond reasonable doubt, and denies defendants rights to notice by indictment and trial by jury?” Apprendi v. New Jersey, 528 U.S. 1018 , 120 S.Ct. 525 , 145 L.Ed.2d 407 (1999). *98 In the absence of good cause to excuse his procedural default, Herrera can secure collateral review of his Apprendi claim only by demonstrating that the alleged error “has probably resulted in the convi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Stone
No. 99-6389.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1999.
528 U.S. 1018
Published

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.