Scherping v. United States, 528 U.S. 1162 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Scherping v. United States, 528 U.S. 1162 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Evans (txwd, 2007-03-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Evans
W.D. Tex. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Grothues, 245 B.R. 828, 832 (W.D.Tex.1999), rev. on other grounds, 226 F.3d 334 (5th Cir.2000); See In re Richards, 231 B.R. 571, 579 (E.D.Pa.1999); see United States v. Scherping, 187 F.3d 796, 801 (8th Cir.1999) (“The government may collect the tax debts of a taxpayer from assets of the taxpayer’s nominee, instrumentality, or ‘alter ego’ ”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1175 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Greer
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1, 15 (2d Cir.1999) (a "sentencing court's findings as to the defendant's role in the offense will be overturned only if they are clearly erroneous" (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000). 115 In United States v. Marino, 29 F.3d 76, 78 (2d Cir.1994), we refused to consider the defendant's conduct in the context of a much larger enterprise because the enterprise's activities were not included in the defendant's relevant conduct to raise her offense level.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Korman
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1 (2d Cir.1999) (§ 2S1.1 applied to fraud scheme), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000); see also United States v. Mustafa, 238 F.3d 485, 496 (3d Cir.2001) (“a court’s § 2S1.1 heartland analysis should address whether defendants engaged in money laundering in which the laundered funds derived from serious underlying criminal conduct such as a significant drug trafficking operation or organized crime or in typical money laundering in which a defendant knowingly conducted a financial transaction to conceal ta…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Donald P. Carpenter
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1, 6 (2d Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000); United States v. Zagari, 111 F.3d 307, 323 (2d Cir.1997).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Greer
2d Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1, 15 (2d Cir.1999) (a “sentencing court’s findings as to the defendant’s role in the offense will be overturned only if they are clearly erroneous” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stoebner v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. (In re Polaroid Corp.)
Bankr. D. Minn. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, generally, U.S. v. Scherping, 187 F.3d 796, 804-805 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. den., 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1175 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Browne (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 737 ] (1984) (‘[a] warrant that fails to conform to the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is unconstitutional’); see also United States v. Stefonek, 179 F.3d 1030, 1033 ([7th Cir.] 1999) (‘[t]he Fourth Amendment requires that the warrant particularly describe the things to be seized, not the papers presented to the judicial officer . . . asked to issue the warrant’ . . . ) [cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S. Ct. 1177 , 145 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Enright
3rd Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1, 10 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000); United States v. Johnson, 971 F.2d 562, 576 (10th Cir.1992).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Aaron D. Jamison v. United States
1st Cir. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Page, 170 F.3d 659, 662 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1177 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1085 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Chambers
4th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Napoli, 179 F.3d 1, 7-8 (2d Cir.1999), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S.Ct. 1176 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1084 (2000); United States v. O’Kane, 155 F.3d 969, 972-73 (8th Cir.1998).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services Finance & Support v. Wilson
Neb. · 2000 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Johnson v. Wing, 178 F.3d 611 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 1162 , 120 S. Ct. 1177 , 145 L.
Scherping
v.
United States
No. 99-1168.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
528 U.S. 1162
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.