green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Marini v. Adamo
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., 193 F.3d 85, 89 (1999) (affirming dismissal where plaintiff alleged that same bank was both "person” and "enterprise”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 1241 , 146 L.Ed.2d 100 (2000); Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp., 93 F.3d 1055, 1064 (1996) (involving complaint alleging that corporate subsidiaries were "persons” and subsidiaries, taken together as parent, were "enterprise”), vacated on other grounds, 525 U.S. 128 , 119 S.Ct. 493 , 142 L.Ed.2d 510 (1998); Bennett [v. United States Trust Co. of New York, 770 F.2d 308, 315 , and n. 2 (2d…
cited
Cited "see"
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CPT Medical Services, P.C.
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., 193 F.3d 85, 88 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 1241 , 146 L.Ed.2d 100 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. New York State Department of Health
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank, 193 F.3d 85 , 89 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 1241 , 146 L.Ed.2d 100 (2000) (upholding dismissal of the complaint without leave to amend where plaintiff had not requested such leave or demonstrated how amendment would correct the shortcomings of the complaint).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pulliam v. Zimmer, Inc.
See Johnny Blastoff, Inc. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co., 188 F.3d 427, 439 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 1241 , 146 L.Ed.2d 100 (2000); Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc., 145 F.3d 1159, 1163-64 (10th Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald Saucier v. Elliot M. Katz and in Defense of Animals
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., 193 F.3d 85, 89 (1999) (affirming dismissal where plaintiff alleged that same bank was both "person" and "enterprise"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 (2000); Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp., 93 F.3d 1055, 1064 (1996) (involving complaint alleging that corporate subsidiaries were "persons" and subsidiaries, taken together as parent, were "enterprise"), vacated on other grounds, 525 U.S. 128 (1998); Bennett, supra, at 315 , and n. 2 (same as Anatian).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U S WEST Communications, Inc.
v.
Federal Communications Commission
v.
Federal Communications Commission
No. 99-869.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 2000.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certio-rari denied.