Boles v. Bradley, 528 U.S. 848 (1999). · Go Syfert
Boles v. Bradley, 528 U.S. 848 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McIntyre v. United States (mad, 2004-09-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McIntyre v. United States
D. Mass. · 2004 · confidence medium
With “liability for negligently inflicted harm” being “categorically beneath the threshold of constitutional due process,” County of Sacramento, 528 U.S. at 848, 118 S.Ct. 1708 , (and I express no opinion here as to whether the plaintiffs have alleged negligence by Kennedy), the conduct of Kennedy does not “shock the judicial conscience,” Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-Montanez, 212 F.3d 617, 623 (1st Cir.2000).
discussed Cited "see" Armstrong v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC.
N.D. Iowa · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) ("It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief," citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accord …
discussed Cited "see" Transamerica Life Insurance v. Lincoln National Life Insurance
N.D. Iowa · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accor…
discussed Cited "see" Kirt v. Fashion Bug 3253, Inc.
N.D. Iowa · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) ("It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); accor…
discussed Cited "see" Torgeson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
N.D. Iowa · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Laurrence County, 155 F.3d 1005,1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)); acco…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
N.D. Iowa · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1051 , 114 S.Ct. 706 , 126 L.Ed.2d 672 (1994)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bunda v. Potter
N.D. Iowa · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
IA.L.R. 7.1(g); Lorenzen v. GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., 345 F.Supp.2d 977 , 992 n. 4 (N.D.Iowa 2004); Baker v. John Morrell & Co., 263 F.Supp.2d 1161 , 1169 n. 1 (N.D.Iowa 2003); see also Republican Party of Minn. v. Kelly, 247 F.3d 854 , 881 *1056 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief,” citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005, 1011 (8th Cir.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Steck v. Francis
N.D. Iowa · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
L.R. 7.1(g); Lorenzen v. GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., 345 F.Supp.2d 977 , 992 n. 4 (N.D.Iowa 2004); Baker v. John Morrell & Co., 263 F.Supp.2d 1161 , 1169 n. 1 (N.D.Iowa 2003); see also Republican Party of Minn. v. *962 Kelly, 247 F.3d 854, 881 (8th Cir.2001) (“It is well established that issues not argued in an opening brief cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief," citing United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass’n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005 , 1011 (8th Cir.1998);…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Republican Party of Minnesota v. Kelly
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Vincent, 167 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 124 , 145 L.Ed.2d 105 (1999); South Dakota Mining Ass'n v. Lawrence County, 155 F.3d 1005 , 1011 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Davis, 52 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995); French v. Beard, 993 F.2d 160, 161 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Darden, 70 F.3d 1507 , 1549 n. 18 (8th Cir.1995) ("Absent some reason for failing to [raise issue in opening brief], we will not consider an issue first raised in a reply brief.”). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boles
v.
Bradley
No. 98-9697.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
528 U.S. 848
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.