green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Shinn
See Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 663 (1996) (considering whether the restriction against successive 7 habeas petitions constitutes a suspension of the writ of habeas corpus); Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 445 (1992); see 8 also Graham v. Johnson, 168 F.3d 762 , 787–88 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1097 (2000) (concluding that 9 AEDPA did not violate the Fifth, Eighth, or Fourteenth Amendments, and that AEDPA’s restrictions on successive 10 petitioners “fall within Congress and the courts’ traditional power to limit abuses of the writ”). 11 Because the exhaustion an…
discussed
Cited "see"
Baena v. Woori Bank
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., 193 F.3d 85 (2d Cir.1999) (applying principle to both Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 9(b) motions), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 1831 , 146 L.Ed.2d 775 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Johnson
See Scott v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 260, 262 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 963 , 121 S.Ct. 1498 , 149 L.Ed.2d 383 (2001) (citing Graham v. Johnson, 168 F.3d 762, 775 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 1830 , 146 L.Ed.2d 774 (2000)); Kiser v. Johnson, 163 F.3d 326, 327 (5th Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1002-06 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1091 , 119 S.Ct. 846 , 142 L.Ed.2d 700 (1999)); Fields, 159 F.3d at 915 ; see also Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 336 , 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amaya-Ruiz v. Stewart
See Graham v. Johnson, 168 F.3d 762, 777-78 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 1830 , 146 L.Ed.2d 774 (2000) (rejecting argument that Supreme Court in Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal treated new petition as continuance of first so as to preclude application of other AEDPA provisions).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sebastian International, Inc. v. Russolillo
See Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., 193 F.3d 85, 88 (2nd Cir.1999) cert. denied 529 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 1831 , 146 L.Ed.2d 775 ; Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp., 12 F.3d 1170 (2nd Cir.1993); Tel-Phonic Services, Inc. v. TBS Int'l., Inc., 975 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gitlitz v. Commissioner
(2×)
Because Courts of Appeals have disagreed on how to treat discharge of indebtedness of an insolvent S corporation, compare Gaudiano v. Commissioner, 216 F. 3d 524, 535 (CA6 2000) (holding that tax attributes are reduced before excluded discharged debt income is passed through to shareholders), cert. pending, No. 00-459; Witzel v. Commissioner, 200 F. 3d 496, 498 (CA7 2000) (same), cert. pending, No. 99-1693; and 182 F. 3d, at 1150 (case below), with United States v. Farley, 202 F. 3d 198, 206 (CA3 2000) (holding that excluded discharged debt income is passed through to shareholders before tax a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Holloman
No. 99-8206.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 2000.
Published
Petition for writ of mandamus denied.