green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.6 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“In particular, a pro se party’s bald assertion, completely unsupported by evidence, is not sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the reliability of a tip must ... be viewed at the time the search becomes necessary”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Silva v. Peninsula Hotel
in particular, a pro se party's bald assertion, completely unsupported by evidence, is not sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jamar Damian Quarles
the reliability of a tip must ... be viewed at the time the search becomes necessary
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Quarles
reasonable suspicion must exist at the time the officer stops an individual, . . . it cannot come after the fact
discussed
Cited "see"
FELICIA AQUINTO v. MK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; KAUFMAN MARKETPLACE, LP; MK MARKETPLACE, LP; TERRY JARRELL d/b/a YELLOW STRIPE PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE; MARK KAUMAN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
LEGAL STANDARD “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Peoples Nat’l Bank v. Office of Comptroller of the Currency of U.S., 362 F.3d 333 , 336 (5th Cir. 2004); accord Howery v. Allstate Ins., 243 F.3d 912, 916 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. MTA Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Schiano v. Quality Payroll Sys., Inc., 445 F.3d 597, 603 (2d Cir.2006) (citation omitted); see Abdur-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456 , 466 (2d Cir.) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oluyomi v. Napolitano
Schiano v. Quality Payroll Sys., Inc., 445 F.3d 597, 603 (2d Cir.2006) (citation omitted); see Abdur-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456 , 466 (2d Cir.) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Robertson v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
See Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 468 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police Commissioner
See Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001) (age discrimination); Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33 , 42 n. 1 (2d Cir.2000) (sex discrimination); Torres v. Pisano, 116 F.3d 625 , 629 n. 1 (2d Cir.1997) (hostile work environment); Van Zant v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 80 F.3d 708, 714-15 (2d Cir.1996) (hostile work environment and retaliation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Singh v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
Nonetheless, summary judgment remains appropriate in discrimination cases, as “the salutary purposes of summary judgment — avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials — -apply no less to discrimination cases than to ... other areas of litigation.” Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985); see also Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466 (2d Cir.) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001); Weinstock…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abdallah v. Napolitano
Nonetheless, summary judgment remains appropriate in discrimination cases, as “the salutary pur poses of summary judgment — avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials — apply no less to discrimination cases than to ... other areas of litigation.” Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985); see also Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466 (2d Cir.) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001); Weinstock…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
Nonetheless, summary judgment remains appropriate in discrimination cases, as “the salutary purposes of summary judgment — avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials — apply no less to discrimination cases than to ... other areas of litigation.” Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.1985); see also Abdu —Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466 (2d Cir.) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001); Weinsto…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center
Corp., 288 AD2d 166, 166 [2001] [same]; Schwaller, 249 AD2d at 196-197 [same]; Broome v Keener, 236 AD2d at 498 [same]; see also Abdu- Brisson v Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F3d 456 , 470 [2d Cir 2001], cert denied 534 US 993 [2001] [“Although Plaintiffs met their de minimis burden of establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination, they have failed to produce sufficient evidence to support a rational finding that the non-discriminatory business reasons proffered by the defendant for the challenged employment actions were false”]; Saenger, 706 F Supp 2d at 507-508 [granting employer su…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center
Corp., 288 AD2d 166, 166 [2001] [same]; Schwaller, 249 AD2d at 196-197 [same]; Broome v Keener, 236 AD2d at 498 [same]; see also Abdu- Brisson v Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F3d 456 , 470 [2d Cir 2001], cert denied 534 US 993 [2001] [“Although Plaintiffs met their de minimis burden of establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination, they have failed to produce sufficient evidence to support a rational finding that the non-discriminatory business reasons proffered by the defendant for the challenged employment actions were false”]; Saenger, 706 F Supp 2d at 507-508 [granting employer su…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vaughn v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS'N, INTERN.
Dist, 374 *541 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 984 , 125 S.Ct. 605 , 160 L.Ed.2d 368 (2004); see also Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466-67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001); Swierkiewicz, 534 U.S. at 510 , 122 S.Ct. 992 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vaughn v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n International
Dist., 374 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 984 , 125 S.Ct. 605 , 160 L.Ed.2d 368 (2004); see also Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466-67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001); Swierkiewicz, 534 U.S. at 510 , 122 S.Ct. 992 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liles v. New York City Department of Education
Meiri, 759 F.2d at 998 ; see also Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 239 F.3d 456, 466 (2d Cir.2001) (“It is now beyond cavil that summary judgment may be appropriate even in the fact-intensive context of discrimination cases.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993, 122 S.Ct. 460 , 151 L.Ed.2d 378 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing
Long v. Bando Mfg. of America, 201 F.3d 754, 759 (6th Cir.2000); see e.g., Howery v. Allstate Insurance Co., 243 F.3d 912, 918 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 993 , 122 S.Ct. 459 , 151 L.Ed.2d 377 (2001); Seinfeld v. Austen, 39 F.3d 761, 763 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School District
Although courts are understandably cautious about granting summary judgment in cases where motive, intent or state of mind is at issue, Montana v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n of Rochester, 869 F.2d 100, 103 (2d Cir.1989); Dister v. Continental Group, Inc., 859 F.2d 1108, 1114 (2d Cir.1988), “the salutary purposes of summary judgment-avoiding protracted, expensive and harassing trials-apply no less to discrimination cases than to ... other areas of litigation.” Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 829 , 106 S.Ct. 91 , 88 L.Ed.2d 74 (1985); see also …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reinish et ux.
v.
Clark, Tax Collector, Palm Beach County
v.
Clark, Tax Collector, Palm Beach County
No. 01-135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2) · S.D. New York (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., denied.