green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Correia
general references glorifying violence" were "far outweighed by . . . unfair prejudicial impact as evidence of appellant's bad character, i.e., his propensity for violence in general
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Hill
evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of the proceeding would have been different. a reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kinford v. Garrett
See Brady v. United States, 4 397 U.S. 742, 750 (1970). “[T]he agents of the State may not produce a plea by actual or 5 threatened physical harm or by mental coercion overbearing the will of the [petitioner]” 6 and a guilty plea is void if it was “induced by promises or threats which deprive it of the 7 character of a voluntary act.” Id.; Iaea v. Sunn, 800 F.2d 861, 866 (9th Cir. 1986); United 8 States v. Kaczynski, 292 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 9 (2002) (citing Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 493 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
(HC) Love v. People of California
Solemn declarations in open court carry a strong presumption 16 of verity.” Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977); see generally United States v. 17 Kaczynski, 239 F.3d 1108, 1114-15 (9th Cir. 2001) (“substantial weight” must be given to a 18 defendant’s in-court statements), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 (2002); Sanchez v. United States, 50 19 F.3d 1448 , 1455 (9th Cir. 1995) (when “during the plea colloquy, [a defendant] specifically 20 denied that any threats and coercions had been used against him[,] [c]ourts generally consider 21 such responses to be strong indicators of th…
cited
Cited "see"
Sommer v. Rhoads
See Rhoads v. F.D.I.C., 257 F.3d 373 , 377-79 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 , 122 S.Ct. 1309 , 152 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kaczynski
See United States v. Kaczynski, 239 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 , 122 S.Ct. 1309 , 152 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002), reh’g denied, 535 U.S. 1043 , 122 S.Ct. 1812 , 152 L.Ed.2d 667 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS, INC.
See Rhoads v. FDIC, 257 F.3d 373, 387, n. 11 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 , 122 S.Ct. 1309 , 152 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School District
See Rhoads *321 v. F.D.I.C., 257 F.3d 373 , 391 (4th Cir.2001) (plaintiff failed to show that her employer erroneously believed that she was substantially limited in her ability to work, because "the record indisputably reveal[ed that her employer] thought the plaintiff was capable of performing her job in a smoke-free environment,” nor could plaintiff establish that her employer mistakenly believed that she was substantially limited in other major life activities, such as breathing, because "the evidence show[ed], at best, that [the employer's] officials knew she suffered from smoke-induced…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Bruneau
See, e.g., Huss v. Graves, 252 F.3d 952, 956 (8th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 and 535 U.S. 951 (2002) (jeopardy attached at bench trial deciding whether defendant should be found not guilty by reason of insanity; defendant could not be retried).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Iniguez
See also United States v. Kentz, 251 F.3d 835, 841-42 (9th Cir.2001) (affirming district court’s imposition of 160 month sentence, which necessarily required stacking, where the guideline range was 135 to 168 months and defendant was convicted on 21 counts, each bearing a five-year maximum sentence), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 , 122 S.Ct. 1309 , 152 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002); United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 48 F.3d 1112, 1117-18 (9th Cir.1995) (citing Joetzki to approve of the district court's stacking to reach a 120-month sentence by imposing consecutive sentences to reach the upper end of 100-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Swanson v. Senior Resource Connection
See, e.g., Rhoads v. F.D.I.C., 257 F.3d 373 , 385-86 (4th Cir.2001) (allowing employer to contest medical certification with contemporaneous evidence which tended to belie employee’s claim that she was sick at the time she submitted her medical certification), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 933 , 122 S.Ct. 1309 , 152 L.Ed.2d 219 (2002); Stekloff v. St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cheeseboro
v.
South Carolina
v.
South Carolina
01-7540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
CHEESEBORO
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 01-7540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
1
Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 346 S. C. 526, 552 S. E. 2d 300.