Blas v. Alameida, Dir., California Dep't of Corr., 536 U.S. 930 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Blas v. Alameida, Dir., California Dep't of Corr., 536 U.S. 930 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re: Gary Ray Bowles (ca11, 2019-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re: Gary Ray Bowles (2×)
11th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bowles v. Florida, 536 U.S. 930 (2002) (mem).
cited Cited "see" Gary Ray Bowles v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
11th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bowles v. Florida , 536 U.S. 930 , 122 S.Ct. 2603 , 153 L.Ed.2d 790 (2002) (mem).
cited Cited "see" Bowles v. Inch
M.D. Fla. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" Young v. Bailey
N.C. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 389 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 571 (2001) (citing State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 86-87 , 552 S.E.2d 596, 607 (2001)), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 122 S. Ct. 2605 , 153 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Reardon
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 425 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 591 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Theer
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 423 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 589 (“In light of the great weight of evidence against defendant presented at trial, we hold that the combined effect of any erroneous evidentiary rulings was not prejudicial to defendant.”) (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Haselden (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
N.C. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 435 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 597 (2001) (the defendant shot the victim once, then shot her a second time while the victim was helpless on the ground and begging for her life), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 122 S.Ct. 2605 , 153 L.Ed.2d 791 (2002); State v. Golphin, 352 N.C. 364, 480-81 , 533 S.E.2d 168, 243 (2000) (although the victim was already incapacitated by the first shot, he was shot "multiple times as he lay on the ground moaning"), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 931 , 121 S.Ct. 1380 , 149 L.Ed.2d 305 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tart
N.C. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Mitchell , 353 N.C. 309 , 324, 543 S.E.2d 830 , 839, cert. denied , 534 U.S. 1000 , 122 S.Ct. 475 , 151 L.Ed.2d 389 (2001) (second alteration in original); see also State v. Anthony , 354 N.C. 372 , 427, 555 S.E.2d 557 , 592 (2001) ("[O]nly an extreme impropriety on the part of the prosecutor will compel this Court to hold that the trial judge abused his discretion in not recognizing and correcting ex mero motu an argument that defense counsel apparently did not believe was prejudicial when originally spoken." (quoting State v. Richardson , 342 N.C. 772 , 786, 467 S.E.2d 685 , 693, ce…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Taylor
N.C. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 425 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 591 (2001) (holding evidence sufficient to warrant flight instruction when, after shooting the victim, “defendant immediately entered his car and quickly drove away from the crime scene without rendering any assistance to the victims or seeking to obtain medical aid for them”), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 (2002).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bethea
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 602 (2003); see also State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372 , 411, 555 S.E.2d 557 , 583 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Diaz v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bowles v. State, 804 So.2d 1173, 1176 (Fla.2001) (discussing aggravator but not mentioning the word "especially"), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 122 S.Ct. 2603 , 153 L.Ed.2d 790 (2002); Rogers v. State, 783 So.2d 980, 994 (Fla.2001) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Clark (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 415 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 585 (2001) (“ ‘Where one party introduces evidence as to a particular fact or transaction, the other party is entitled to introduce evidence in explanation or rebuttal thereof, even though such latter evidence would be incompetent or irrelevant had it been offered initially.’ ”) (quoting State v. Albert, 303 N.C. 173, 177 , 277 S.E.2d 439, 441 (1981)), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Walters
N.C. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, “ [constitutional issues not raised and passed upon at trial will not be considered for the first time on appeal.” Lloyd, 354 N.C. at 86-87 , 552 S.E.2d at 607 ; see also State v. Anthony, 354 N.C. 372, 389 , 555 S.E.2d 557, 571 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 930 , 153 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blas
v.
Alameida, Director, California Department of Corrections
01-9729.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 2002.
536 U.S. 930
Published

536 U.S. 930

BLAS
v.
ALAMEIDA, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

No. 01-9729.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 17, 2002.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.