green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Caseer
See United States v. Al-Zubaidy, 283 F.3d 804, 808 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 (2002); United States v. Atwell, 570 F.2d 650, 652 (6th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daahir Caseer
(2×)
See United States v. Al-Zubaidy, 283 F.3d 804, 808 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2638 , 153 L.Ed.2d 818 (2002); United States v. Atwell, 570 F.2d 650, 652 (6th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent P. Hurley
Id. at 77 (footnote omitted). 1 So long as the standards for relevant conduct were satisfied — i.e., that “the acts of coconspira-tors were in furtherance of the jointly undertaken activity and were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant,” id. at 83— there was “no justification for limiting ‘underlying racketeering activity’ just to predicate acts specifically charged against one defendant,” id. at 77 (footnote omitted); accord, e.g., United States v. Marino, 277 F.3d 11, 37 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2639 , 153 L.Ed.2d 819 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruder
See United States v. Marino, 277 F.3d 11, 35 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2639 , 153 L.Ed.2d 819 (2002); United States v. Riddle, 249 F.3d 529, 538 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 930 , 122 S.Ct. 292 (2001); United States v. Feliciano, 223 F.3d 102, 117-19 (2d Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Crenshaw
See United States v. Marino, 277 F.3d 11, 35 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 (2002); United States v. Riddle, 249 F.3d 529, 538 (6th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 930 (2001); United States v. Feliciano, 223 F.3d 102, 117-19 (2d Cir. 2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ponce-Covarrubias
See United States v. Aparco-Centeno, 280 F.3d 1084, 1090 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2638 , 153 L.Ed.2d 818 (2002) (citing Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maldonado-Montalvo
That is to say, the district court must attribute to the defendants the amounts of loss resulting from “all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity.” U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l)(B); see United States v. Marino, 277 F.3d 11, 37 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2639 , 153 L.Ed.2d 819 (2002); United States v. Adeniji, 221 F.3d 1020, 1027 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Duliga, 204 F.3d 97, 100 (3d Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co.
See United States v. Marino, 277 F.3d 11, 32 (1st Cir.2002) (concluding that there cannot be plain error where the law is unsettled), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 948 , 122 S.Ct. 2639 , 153 L.Ed.2d 819 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bain
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-10342.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 2002.
Published
BAIN
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-10342.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 24, 2002.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 32 Fed. Appx. 256.