green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Crescent Electric Supply, Co.
See Joens v. John Morrell & Co., 243 F.Supp.2d 920, 947 (N.D.Ia.2003) (quoting Gagnon v. Sprint Corp., 284 F.3d 839, 850 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 485 , 154 L.Ed.2d 396 (2002), abrogation recognized on other grounds, Maxfield v. Cintas Corp., No. 2, 487 F.3d 1132 (8th Cir.2007) (citation omitted)) (“ ‘An adverse employment action is a tangible change in working conditions that produces a material employment disadvantage.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Leo v. Felton Erica Chase, Appellants/cross-Appellees
See Gray v. Genlyte Group, Inc., 289 F.3d 128, 131 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 485 , 154 L.Ed.2d 397 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chase
See Gray v. Genlyte Group, Inc., 289 F.3d 128, 131 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1001 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co.
See Gray v. Genlyte Group, Inc., 289 F.3d 128, 134 (1st Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 485 , 154 L.Ed.2d 397 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gray
v.
Genlyte Thomas Group, LLC
v.
Genlyte Thomas Group, LLC
02-314.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 2002.
Published
GRAY
v.
GENLYTE THOMAS GROUP, LLC.
No. 02-314.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 4, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 289 F. 3d 128.