Orange Bang, Inc. v. Juicy Whip, Inc, 537 U.S. 1019 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Orange Bang, Inc. v. Juicy Whip, Inc, 537 U.S. 1019 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pena v. Clark County (wawd, 2023-09-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Pena v. Clark County (2×)
W.D. Wash. · 2023 · confidence medium
Id. at 1036.
cited Cited "see" Attar 2018, LLC v. Taylor, City of
E.D. Mich. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Quinn v. Shirey, 293 F.3d 315, 320 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1019 (2002).
examined Cited "see" Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc. (4×)
Fed. Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., 292 F.3d 728, 743 (Fed.Cir.2002) (holding that “the evidence of record [comprised solely of oral testimony] did not provide the clear and convincing evidence necessary to invalidate the patent for prior public knowledge”), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 1019 , 123 S.Ct. 537 , 154 L.Ed.2d 426 (U.S.2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nussbaumer v. General Electric Co.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
We reject defendant’s remaining contention that, because the court dismissed the causes of action sounding in strict products liability, it necessarily erred in not also dismissing the causes of action sounding in negligence (see Barry v Manglass, 77 AD2d 887, 889-890 [1980], affd 55 NY2d 803 [1981], rearg denied 55 NY2d 1039 [1982]; see also Jarvis v Ford Motor Co., 283 F3d 33, 62-63 [2002], cert denied 537 US 1019 [2002]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Orange Bang, Inc.
v.
Juicy Whip, Inc
02-373.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 2002.
537 U.S. 1019
Published

537 U.S. 1019

ORANGE BANG, INC., ET AL.
v.
JUICY WHIP, INC.

No. 02-373.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 12, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 292 F. 3d 728.