green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McDermott v. State
See Cudworth, v. State, 818 N.E.2d 133, 140 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (quoting United States v. Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331, 1337 (11th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161 , 123 S.Ct. 966 , 154 L.Ed.2d 897 ) ("[I]n validating a war-rantless search based on the existence of an *475 emergency, as with any other situation falling within the exigent circumstances exception, the Government must demonstrate both exigency and probable cause.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winchester v. Cosaineau
See United States v. Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331, 1335-36 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161 , 123 S.Ct. 966 , 154 L.Ed.2d 897 (2003); Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 556 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001); United States v. Cervantes, 219 F.3d 882, 889 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 912 , 121 S.Ct. 1242 , 149 L.Ed.2d 150 (2001); United States v. Richardson, 208 F.3d 626, 629-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 910 , 121 S.Ct. 259 , 148 L.Ed.2d 188 (2000); Tierney v. Davidson, 133 F.3d 189, 196-99 (2nd Cir.1998); United States v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K.P. v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331, 1339 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161 , 123 S.Ct. 966 , 154 L.Ed.2d 897 (2003) (upholding the fruits of an investigative detention and search of individuals on a front porch based upon anonymous tip that shots had been fired: "when an emergency is reported by an anonymous caller, the need for immediate action may outweigh the need to verify the reliability of the caller”); People v. Wells, 38 Cal.4th 1078 , 45 Cal.Rptr.3d 8 , 136 P.3d 810, 815 (2006), cert. denied, 550 U.S. 937 , 127 S.Ct. 2246 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1096 (2007) (holdin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
See State v. Slade, 116 N.H. 436, 438 (1976) (holding gunshots in home justified warrantless police entry to determine whether there was a victim); see also United States v. Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331, 1336-37 (11th Cir. 2002) (listing cases and situations in which endangerment to life justified warrantless entry), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161 (2003); People v. McBride, 872 N.Y.S. 2d 109 (N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frankel
(2×)
"A 9-1-1 call is one of the most common ... means through which police and other emergency personnel learn that there is someone in a dangerous situation who urgently needs help." United States v. Richardson, 208 F. 3d 626, 630 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 910 , 121 S.Ct. 259 , 148 L.Ed. 2d 188 (2000); see also United States v. Holloway, 290 F. 3d 1331, 1339 (11th Cir.2002) ("911 calls are the predominant means of communicating emergency situations."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161 , 123 S.Ct. 966 , 154 L.Ed. 2d 897 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sanders
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-6924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2003.
Published
SANDERS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-6924.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 21, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 37 Fed. Appx. 498.