green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
KSEND v. United States
pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ada Bobbitt v. Anthony J. Principi
the veterans' benefits system remains a non-adversarial system when cases are pending before the veterans' administration. however, the court of appeals for veterans claims' proceedings are not non-adversarial.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santos
Accordingly, the doctrine of procedural default precludes the district court from considering certain claims presented in a § 2255 motion that the defendant could have raised on direct appeal, unless the defendant “can show good cause for failing to raise the issue[s] and actual prejudice.” Galbraith v. United States, 313 F.3d 1001, 1006 (7th Cir.2002); accord Mankarious v. United States, 282 F.3d 940, 943 (7th Cir.2002) (“An issue not raised on direct appeal is barred from collateral review absent a showing of both good cause for and actual prejudice resulting from the failure to asser…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry R. Shedden, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
(2×)
See Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335, 1352 (Fed.Cir.) ( en banc ) (referring to the presumption of service connection set forth in 38 U.S.C. 105(a)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 110 , 154 L.Ed.2d 33 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Systems
See Terrill v. Chao, 31 Fed.Appx. 99, 100 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 108 , 154 L.Ed.2d 32 (2002). 6 Accordingly, in addition to finding that Count I must be dismissed for failure to allege an actionable adverse employment action, as discussed supra, this Court must dismiss Count I for failure to aver that Defendants discriminated against a protected class of individuals. 7 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Merit System Protection Board
See Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1385 , 1335-45 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc) (Ordinarily, this court does not consider issues that were not raised below.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 110 , 154 L.Ed.2d 33 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowers v. Bell
See also Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335 , 1357 n. 20 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 110 , 154 L.Ed.2d 33 (2002), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Morgan v. Principi, 327 F.3d 1357, 1358-59 (Fed.Cir.2003) (‘ “Appellate review does not consist of supine submission to erroneous legal concepts even though none of the parties declaimed the applicable law below.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Corrigan v. United States
McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 501 F.3d 1354, 1356 (Fed.Cir.2007); see also Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335, 1357 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 110 , 154 L.Ed.2d 33 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodruff v. United States
McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp., 501 F.3d 1354, 1356 (Fed.Cir.2007); see also Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335, 1357 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 823 , 123 S.Ct. 110 , 154 L.Ed.2d 33 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Plati
v.
Plati
01-1821.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Veterans Claims (1) · Federal Claims (1)
SMITH
v.
PLATI ET AL.
No. 01-1821.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 F. 3d 1167.