Daniel v. Cockrell, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., 537 U.S. 874 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Daniel v. Cockrell, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., 537 U.S. 874 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jones v. Cockrell (ca5, 2003-07-28) · Strongest negative: Commonwealth v. Clarke (mass, 2011-06-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Commonwealth v. Clarke
Mass. · 2011 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Daniel v. Cockrell, 283 F.3d 697, 708 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 874 (2002) (appearing, without discussion, to assume that Flores-Ortega created new rule, but finding that case was inapplicable).
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. Cockrell (2×)
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Daniel v. Cockrell, 283 F.3d 697, 702 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 874 , 123 S.Ct. 286 , 154 L.Ed.2d 126 (2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hayes
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carter, 283 F.3d 755, 760 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 286 , 154 L.Ed.2d 126 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Gibbs v. Warden LA State
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Daniel v. Cockrell, 283 F.3d 697, 705 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 286 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rosche
E.D. Wis. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carter, 283 F.3d 755, 758-61 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 286 , — L.Ed.2d -(2002) for a discussion of the difficulties in interpreting § 4A1.2(a)(2) and the circuit split it has engendered.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Goetchius (2×)
D. Me. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Some Circuits have held that sentences are not functionally consolidated “when offenses proceed to sentencing under separate docket numbers, cases are not related, and there was no order of consolidation,” United States v. McAdams, 25 F.3d 370, 374 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 939 , 115 S.Ct. 342 , 130 L.Ed.2d 299 (1994) (citation and internal punctuation omitted); see also United States v. Klein, 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1226 , 114 S.Ct. 2722 , 129 L.Ed.2d 846 (1994), or when judgment was pronounced on the same day with sentences to run concurren…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
01-10977.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 874
Published

537 U.S. 874

DANIEL
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.

No. 01-10977.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 283 F. 3d 697.