Kolberg v. Mississippi, 538 U.S. 981 (2003). · Go Syfert
Kolberg v. Mississippi, 538 U.S. 981 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Tommy Cruz, Luis Rodriguez, Carlos Medina (ca2, 2004-04-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Tommy Cruz, Luis Rodriguez, Carlos Medina (2×)
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
charges of ... 'aiding and abetting' require the government to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant knew the specific nature of the ... underlying crime.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Samuels
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Luebbers, 307 F.3d 722, 728 (8th Cir.2002) (noting that the government could exercise a peremptory challenge to excuse a potential juror who could not be removed for cause after he had been rehabilitated by the defense), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 , *1019 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 671 (2003); see also Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) (“[T]he prosecutor’s explanation [for a peremptory strike] need not rise to the level justifying exercise of a challenge for cause.”).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Terry Samuels
8th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See White v. Luebbers, 307 F.3d 722, 728 (8th Cir. 2002) (noting that the government could exercise a peremptory challenge to excuse a potential juror who could not be removed for cause after he had been rehabilitated by the defense), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 (2003); see also Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 97 (1986) ("[T]he prosecutor's explanation [for a peremptory strike] need not rise to the level justifying exercise of a challenge for cause.").
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Santos (2×)
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Friedman, 300 F.3d 111, 126 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 , 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003); United States v. Samaria, 239 F.3d 228, 236-38 (2d Cir.2001); Atehortva, 17 F.3d at 551 ; United States v. Nusraty, 867 F.2d 759, 765 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Lonegan v. Hasty
E.D.N.Y · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Friedman, 300 F.3d 111, 120-23 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 , 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 *431 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003); United States v. Workman, 80 F.3d 688, 692-94 (2d Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 519 U.S. 938 , 117 S.Ct. 319 , 136 L.Ed.2d 233 (1996) and 519 U.S. 955 , 117 S.Ct. 373 , 136 L.Ed.2d 262 (1996); United States v. Willoughby, 860 F.2d 15, 19-20 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 846 , 102 L.Ed.2d 978 (1989); Amen, 831 F.2d at 378-80 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Siddiq v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Lewis, 406 F.3d 11, 16-18 (1st Cir.2005) (“In other words, the acquisition of the contents of a communication by an investigative or law[-]enforcement officer in the ordinary course of his duties is not an interception for [purposes of the federal wiretap statute].”), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 917 , 126 S.Ct. 2951 , 165 L.Ed.2d 973 (2006); see also United States v. Friedman, 300 F.3d 111, 122-23 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 , 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003); United States v. Hammond, 286 F.3d 189, 192 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 900 , 123 S.Ct.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Salinas (2×)
1st Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ringer, 300 F.3d 788, 790-92 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 981 , 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003); United States v. Candella, 487 F.2d 1223, 1227-28 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Igor Brunshtein, Also Known as \Mark
unknown court · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 16-20 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 ; see also United States v. Friedman, 300 F.3d 111, 127-28 (2d Cir.2002) (applying harmless error analysis to alleged omission of element *100 from jury instructions), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." William T. Coleman v. United States (2×)
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Friedman, 300 F.3d 111, 127-28 (2d Cir.2002) (holding that Apprendi error was "harmless"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 1785 , 155 L.Ed.2d 672 (2003); Outen, 286 F.3d at 639-40 (holding that Apprendi error did not affect the defendant's "substantial rights"); see also United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 , 122 S.Ct. 1781, 1786 , 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002) (holding that Apprendi error did not "seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings"); cf. Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 17 , 119 S.Ct. 1827 , 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (199…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kolberg
v.
Mississippi
02-8855.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2003.
538 U.S. 981

538 U.S. 981

KOLBERG
v.
MISSISSIPPI.

No. 02-8855.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 21, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.

2

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 829 So. 2d 29.