Ortiz v. Texas, 538 U.S. 998 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Ortiz v. Texas, 538 U.S. 998 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases · “[A] defensive instruction is not required when the issue in question is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and merely serves to negate elements of the State’s case”
74 citation events (73 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Burkett v. State (texapp, 2005-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Burkett v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
defensive instruction is not required when the issue in question is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and merely serves to negate elements of the state's case
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roger Fountain v. State
Tex. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. 2002) (addressing sufficiency of evidence to prove “prospective witness” element of retaliation offense under penal code section 36.06(a)(1)(A)), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 998 (2003); see also id. at 95–96 (Keller, J., concurring) (explaining term “prospective witness” has the same meaning under the retaliation statute and under the tampering-with-a-witness statute).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Deaver v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956-57 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (affirming the appellant’s conviction when the facts surrounding the search were not sufficiently developed) (citing Jackson v. State, 877 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.Crim.App.1994)); see also Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 93 (Tex.Crim.App.2002), ce rt. denied, 538 U.S. 998 , 123 S.Ct. 1901 , 155 L.Ed.2d 824 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quattrocchi v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Giesberg v. State, the court of criminal appeals determined that defenses that have been created by the legislature that tend either to totally exonerate a defendant or to excuse or justify a defendant's conduct so that he is absolved of culpability, *123 such as those identified in chapters eight (General Defenses to Criminal Responsibility) and Nine (Justifications for Criminal Conduct) of the penal code, require a special instruction. 984 S.W.2d 245, 248-50 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1147 , 119 S.Ct. 1044 , 143 L.Ed.2d 51 (1999); see also Ortiz v. State, 93 S.W.3d 79, 92…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ortiz
v.
Texas
02-1189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 2003.
538 U.S. 998
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)

538 U.S. 998

ORTIZ
v.
TEXAS.

No. 02-1189.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 28, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.

2

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 93 S. W. 3d 79.