Prenatt v. Superior Court of California, Sacramento Cnty., 539 U.S. 947 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Prenatt v. Superior Court of California, Sacramento Cnty., 539 U.S. 947 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Juan Chavez v. Florida SP Warden, etal (ca11, 2014-02-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Juan Chavez v. Florida SP Warden, etal (3×)
11th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chavez v. Florida, 539 U.S. 947 , 123 S.Ct. 2617 , 156 L.Ed.2d 637 (2003). 1 In order to overcome Florida’s statute of limitations defense, Mr. Chavez “must show that he filed his § 1983 complaint within [four] years of a significant change in [Florida’s] method of administering lethal injections.” Arthur v. Thomas, 674 F.3d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir.2012) (emphasis added).
cited Cited "see" Davis v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chavez v. State, 832 So.2d 730 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, __ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2617 , 156 L.Ed.2d 637 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Maxwell v. State (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 435 , 120 S.Ct. 2326 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 479 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Everett, 893 So.2d at 1284 ; Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568, 573 (Fla.1999) ("Suspects must also be informed that they have a right to an attorney during questioning, and that if they cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for them without cost.") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 970 , 145 L.Ed.2d 841 (2000); Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992); see also Chavez v. State, 832 So.2d 73…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Downes v. Carroll
D. Del. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 948 , 123 S.Ct. 2617 , 156 L.Ed.2d 637 (2003)(holding that there were no extraordinary circumstances to equitably toll the limitations period even though petitioner’s attorney could not obtain the trial transcript, because petitioner could still file a basic habeas petition); Scott v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 260, 263 (5th Cir.2000) (no equitable tolling where petitioner had been denied access to legal materials for six months, but had regained access six months prior to expiration of limitations period).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Prenatt
v.
Superior Court of California, Sacramento County
02-10285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 2003.
539 U.S. 947
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

539 U.S. 947

Prenatt
v.
Superior Court of California, Sacramento County.

No. 02-10285.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 23, 2003.

1

Appeal from the Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist.

2

Certiorari denied.