Dawkins Et Ux. v. Witt, Dir., Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 539 U.S. 960 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Dawkins Et Ux. v. Witt, Dir., Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 539 U.S. 960 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Murphy v. State (mdctspecapp, 2010-05-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Murphy v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cavely, 318 F.3d 987, 995 (10th Cir.) (“Although it is true that Buie involved an in-home arrest, courts have recognized that the same exigent circumstances present in Buie can sometimes accompany an arrest just outside of a residence or other structure.”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 960 , 123 S.Ct. 2653 , 156 L.Ed.2d 659 (2003); United States v. Colbert, 76 F.3d 773, 776-77 (6th Cir.1996) (“that the arrest takes place outside rather than inside the home affects only the inquiry into whether the officers had a reasonable articulable suspicion that a protective sweep is n…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Gamboa
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cavely, 318 F.3d 987, 1000 (10th Cir.) ("[A] determination of whether a firearm is a prohibited assault weapon under [§ 924(c)(1)(B)(i)] is a sentencing factor and not an essential element of the offense that must be proven at trial."), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 960 (2003); Harrison, 272 F.3d -19- at 226 (same); United States v. Sandoval, 241 F.3d 549, 552 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1057 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Gerald Gamboa
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cavely, 318 F.3d 987, 1000 (10th Cir.) (“[A] determination of whether a firearm is a prohibited assault weapon under [§ 924(c)(1)(B)(i) ] is a sentencing factor and not an essential element of the offense that must be proven at trial.”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 960 , 123 S.Ct. 2653 , 156 L.Ed.2d 659 (2003); Harrison, 272 F.3d at 226 (same); United States v. Sandoval, 241 F.3d 549, 552 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1057 , 122 S.Ct. 649 , 151 L.Ed.2d 566 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Guy Zappulla v. People of the State of New York
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aleman v. Sternes, 320 F.3d 687, 690-91 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 960 , 123 S.Ct. 2653 , 156 L.Ed.2d 659 (2003) (noting that a federal court may grant habeas relief only if it finds that the state court unreasonably applied Chapman and the error is cognizable under Brecht ); Saiz v. Burnett, 296 F.3d 1008, 1012 (10th Cir.2002) ("[T]he proper question on federal habeas review is whether the Colorado appellate court's application of the Chapman standard was objectively unreasonable.... [If a court concludes that it was], the court should engage in an independent harmless error analy…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Spencer
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Cavely, 318 F.3d 987, 995 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 960 , 123 S. Ct. 2653 , 156 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dawkins Et Ux.
v.
Witt, Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency
02-1625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 2003.
539 U.S. 960
Published

539 U.S. 960

Dawkins et ux.
v.
Witt, Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

No. 02-1625.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 27, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 4th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 318 F. 3d 606.