green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 ·
…juries are still capable of distinguishing between real and virtual images.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2005 ·
…statutes trump guidelines when the two conflict
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Frabizio
(2×)
juries are still capable of distinguishing between real and virtual images.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bly
(2×)
statutes trump guidelines when the two conflict
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez-Pacheco
(4×)
See United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1141 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1083 , 124 S.Ct. 945 , 157 L.Ed.2d 759 (2003); United States v. Kelly, 314 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1001 , 123 S.Ct. 1923 , 155 L.Ed.2d 829 (2003); United States v. Hall, 312 F.3d 1250, 1259 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 954 , 123 S.Ct. 1646 , 155 L.Ed.2d 502 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley Joseph Slanina, Also Known as Wesley J. Slanina
See United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1142 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 945 , 157 L.Ed.2d 759 (2003); United States v. Deaton, 328 F.3d 454, 455 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam)(citing United States v. Vig, 167 F.3d 443, 449-50 (8th Cir.1999)); United States v. Hall, 312 F.3d 1250, 1260 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 954 , 123 S.Ct. 1646 , 155 L.Ed.2d 502 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DLC
See United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1146 (10th Cir.) (holding federal DNA Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 constitutional under special needs analysis), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 945 , ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2003); Goord, 2003 WL 256774 , at *14 (holding New York's DNA indexing program constitutional under special needs analysis); Miller, 259 F.Supp.2d at 1177 (holding Patriot Act's DNA provision constitutional under special needs analysis); Sczubelek, 255 F.Supp.2d at 319-23 (holding federal DNA Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 constitutional under special needs analysis); Vore, 2…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re D.L.C.
See United States v. Kimler, 335 F.3d 1132, 1146 (10th Cir.) (holding federal DNA Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 constitutional under special needs analysis), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 945 , — L.Ed.2d - (2003); Goord, 2003 WL 256774 , at *14 (holding New York’s DNA indexing program constitutional under special needs analysis); Miller, 259 F.Supp.2d at 1177 .(holding Patriot Act’s DNA provision constitutional under special needs analysis); Sczubelek, 255 F.Supp.2d at 319-23 (holding federal DNA Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 constitutional under special needs analysis); Vore, 2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kimler
v.
United States
v.
United States
03-7285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2) · D. Massachusetts (2)
KIMLER
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 03-7285.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 8, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 335 F. 3d 1132.