Hines v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 827 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Hines v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 827 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2005 · …t is not necessary to prove the validity of the underlying warrant before applying 4a1.1(d). ⚠ not in text
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mateo v. United States (ca1, 2005-02-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Mateo v. United States (2×)
1st Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
t is not necessary to prove the validity of the underlying warrant before applying 4a1.1(d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. Reed
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2012 · confidence medium
Id. at 64.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Marcus Fitzgerald Stevenson (2×)
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
Stevenson’s Criminal-History Score On appeal, Stevenson challenges the district court’s addition of two criminal-history points because he committed the instant offense while under a criminal-justice sentence. 1 Under the Sentencing Guidelines, the sentencing court must add two criminal-history points “if the defendant committed the instant offense while under any criminal justice sentence, including probation, parole, supervised release, imprisonment, work release, or escape status.” U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(d); accord United States v. Davis, 313 F.3d 1300, 1305 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Weathers
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 313 F.3d 1300, 1305-06 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 49 , 157 L.Ed.2d 50 (2003); United States v. Mateo, 271 F.3d 11, 16 (1st Cir.2001); United States v. Anderson, 184 F.3d 479, 481 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Elmore, 108 F.3d 23, 27-28 (3d Cir.1997); United States v. Camilo, 71 F.3d 984 (1st Cir.1995). * We find these authorities persuasive.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Titterington
W.D. Tenn. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See DeGeorge, 219 F.3d at 937 ; see also United States v. Torres, 318 F.3d 1058, 1061 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 827 , 124 S.Ct. 50 , 157 L.Ed.2d 51 (2003) (stating "[u]nder § 3292, the government may apply, ex parte, for suspension of the statute of limitations when it seeks evidence located in a foreign country.”).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Robinson (4×)
Pa. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Commonwealth v. Rollins, 558 Pa. 532, 738 A.2d 435, 441 (1999) (internal citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Miller, 572 Pa. 623, 819 A.2d 504, 517 (2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 827 , 124 S.Ct. 50 , 157 L.Ed.2d 50 (2003); Commonwealth v. Tilley, 566 Pa. 312 , 780 A.2d 649, 652 (2001). 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hines
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
02-9952.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 827
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)

540 U.S. 827

HINES
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.

No. 02-9952.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 57 Fed. Appx. 210.