Christenberry v. Allen, 540 U.S. 877 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Christenberry v. Allen, 540 U.S. 877 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“decisions relating to the monitoring, screening, and deletion of content from network -- actions quintessentially related to a publisher's role”
41 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (mass, 2026-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Mass. · 2026 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
decisions relating to the monitoring, screening, and deletion of content from network -- actions quintessentially related to a publisher's role
cited Cited "see" Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys
8th Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hays v. Hoffman, 325 F.3d 982 , 986 n.2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Ketroser v. Mayo Foundation
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hays v. Hoffman, 325 F.3d 982 , 987 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 277 , 157 L.Ed.2d 139 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Mathirampuzha v. Potter
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moe v. United States, 326 F.3d 1065,1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 281 , 157 L.Ed.2d 141 (2003); Figueroa v. United States, 7 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1030 , 114 S.Ct. 1537 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994); Sheehan v. United States, 896 F.2d 1168, 1173-74 (9th Cir.), amended, 917 F.2d 424 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see" Mathirampuzha v. Potter
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moe v. United States, 326 F.3d 5 1065, 1068 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 (2003); 6 Figueroa v. United States, 7 F.3d 1405, 1407-08 (9th Cir. 1993), 7 cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1030 (1994); Sheehan v. United States, 896 8 F.2d 1168 , 1173-74 (9th Cir.), amended, 917 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 9 1990).
discussed Cited "see" Info-Hold Incorporated v. Sound Merchandising Incorporat
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: accord · confidence high
No. 07-4238 Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc. Page 5 In other words, under this abuse of discretion standard, “conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and factual findings are reviewed for clear error.” Jordan v. Paccar, Inc., No. 95-3478, 1996 WL 528950, at *5 (6th Cir. Sept. 17, 1996) (unpublished); accord United States v. Pauley, 321 F.3d 578, 581 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc.
6th Cir. · 2008 · signal: accord · confidence high
In other words, under this abuse of discretion standard, “conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and factual findings are reviewed for clear error.” Jordan v. Paccar, Inc., No. 95-3478, 1996 WL 528950, at *5 (6th Cir. Sept.17, 1996) (unpublished); accord United States v. Pauley, 321 F.3d 578, 581 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 201 , 157 L.Ed.2d 140 (2003).
cited Cited "see" DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEES
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hays v. Hoffman, 325 F.3d 982 , 986 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 277 , 157 L.Ed.2d 139 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sawyer v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
S.D. Ala. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and there is a presumption against the exercise of federal jurisdiction, such that all uncertainties as to removal jurisdiction are to be resolved in favor of remand.” Russell Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 264 F.3d 1040, 1050 (11th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds as recognized in Overlook Gardens Properties, LLC v. ORIX USA, L.P., 927 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2019); see also Allen v. Christenberry, 327 F.3d 1290 , 1293 (11th Cir.) (“[R]emoval statutes should be construed narrowly, with doubts resolved again…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." South Dallas Water Authority v. Guarantee Co. of North America, USA
S.D. Ala. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
There can be no doubt but that “[fjederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and there is a presumption against the exercise of federal jurisdiction, such that all uncertainties as to removal jurisdiction are to be resolved in favor of remand.” Russell Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 264 F.3d 1040, 1050 (11th Cir.2001) (citation omitted); see also Allen v. Christenberry, 327 F.3d 1290 , 1293 (11th Cir.) (“[R]emoval statutes should be construed narrowly, with doubts resolved against removal.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 877 , 124 S.Ct. 277 , 157 L.Ed.2d 140 (2003); University…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Christenberry
v.
Allen
03-94.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 877
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case

540 U.S. 877

CHRISTENBERRY ET AL.
v.
ALLEN.

No. 03-94.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 327 F. 3d 1290.