Estrada v. United States, 540 U.S. 892 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Estrada v. United States, 540 U.S. 892 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (ca11, 2013-01-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Norman Merle Grim, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
11th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grim v. State, 841 So.2d 455 (Fla.2003) (affirming convictions and death sentence), cert. denied, Grim v. Florida, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003). 2 .
cited Cited "see" Grim v. State
Fla. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grim v. Florida, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Boyd v. State
Fla. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grim v. State, 841 So.2d 455, 461 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Fitzpatrick v. State
Fla. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grim v. State, 841 So.2d 455, 464 (Fla.) (holding the death sentence proportional for the first-degree murder and sexual battery conviction where the aggravators included the murder was committed by a person under sentence of imprisonment, the defendant had prior convictions for violent felonies, and the murder was committed while the defendant was engaged in the commission of a sexual battery), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003); Darling v. State, 808 So.2d 145, 164 (Fla.2002) (holding death sentence proportional where murder was committed while defendant …
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Jackmon
Mass. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Weems, 322 F.3d 18 , 23 n.3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 892 (2003) (discussing favorably the need for a warrant to search third-party premises for person with outstanding arrest warrant and quoting 5 LaFave, Search and Seizure § 11.3[b], at 143 [3d ed. 1996] as describing analysis that would not apply Steagald to the arrestee’s claim as “bizarre reasoning [that] would render the Steagald rule a virtual nullity”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Tatum
Mass. · 2013 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 576 F.3d 465, 467-468 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1062 (2009) (rejecting defendant’s claim that police needed search as well as arrest warrant to enter third party’s apartment to effect arrest), United States v. Agnew, 407 F.3d 193, 196-197 (3d Cir. 2005) (even if arrestee in third party’s house had reasonable expectation of privacy because he was overnight guest, he was not protected by search warrant requirement, and not entitled to suppress evidence obtained during warrantless entry by police to effect his arrest), United States v. Kaylo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estrada
v.
United States
03-5172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 892
Published

540 U.S. 892

ESTRADA
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 03-5172.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 65 Fed. Appx. 509.