Hutchins v. Crawford, Dir., Nevada Dep't of Corr., 540 U.S. 900 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Hutchins v. Crawford, Dir., Nevada Dep't of Corr., 540 U.S. 900 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rogers v. Howard (wawd, 2024-07-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rogers v. Howard
W.D. Wash. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 5 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 (2003) (a parties’ right to de novo 6 review by the district court may be deemed waived if objections are not timely filed); Ghazali v. 7 Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995) (although courts construe the pleadings of pro se litigants 8 liberally in their favor, they are still required to follow the rules of procedure). 9 Based on the foregoing, the Court HEREBY ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, 10 GRANTS the State Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and DISMISSES Plaintiff’…
cited Cited "see" Gorney v. Arizona Board of Regents
D. Ariz. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Diaz-Amador v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgages
D. Ariz. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238, 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Galligan v. Astrue
D. Ariz. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See *1106 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Werle v. Astrue
D. Ariz. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Castillo
D. Ariz. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Njai v. United States
D. Ariz. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Cooper v. QC Financial Services, Inc.
D. Ariz. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Cano v. Schriro
D. Ariz. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Handy Bailey v. Warden, FCI Miami (2×)
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sawyer v. Holder, 326 F.3d 1363, 1365 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 258 , 157 L.Ed.2d 181 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Siring v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. Eastern Oregon University
D. Or. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Indeed, where there are no objections, “[t]here is no indication that Congress ... intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report[.]” Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 152 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003) (the court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but not otherwise”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James v. ReconTrust Co.
D. Or. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
For those portions of an F & R to which neither party has objected, the Magistrates Act does not prescribe any standard of review: “There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Magistrates Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report[.]” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en bane), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003) (the court must review de novo a magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Werthy v. Astrue
D. Or. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
In such cases, “[tjhere is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Magistrates Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report[.]” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 900 , 124 S.Ct. 238 , 157 L.Ed.2d 182 (2003) (the court must review de novo magistrate’s findings and recommendations if objection is made, “but not otherwise”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hutchins
v.
Crawford, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections
03-5292.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 900
Published

540 U.S. 900

HUTCHINS
v.
CRAWFORD, DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

No. 03-5292.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.