green
Positive treatment
15.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Andria Priestley v. Michael Astrue
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
However one views the persuasiveness of the assumed reasons offered as to why out-of-state attorneys are less likely to be competent, see id. at 1181 (observing, without citation to authority or empirical evidence, that "the standard for admission in both Arizona and California may well exceed that required in other states"), or more difficult to discipline, see id., the point powerfully raised by the case at bar is whether, in the area of exclusive federal practice, such as social security disability appeals, a limited exception to such requirements such as that applied by some of the distric…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Andria Priestley v. Michael Astrue
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
However one views the persuasiveness of the assumed reasons offered as to why out-of-state attorneys are less likely to be competent, see id. at 1118 (observing, without citation to authority or empirical evidence, that "the standard for admission in both Arizona and California may well exceed that required in other states"), or more difficult to discipline, see id., the point powerfully raised by the case at bar is whether, in the area of exclusive federal practice, such as social security disability appeals, a limited exception to such requirements such as that applied by some of the distric…
discussed
Cited "see"
Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
Ed. 2d 39 (2006); accord Rules of Professional Con- duct, preamble. ‘‘[A] hearing such as this is not the trial of a criminal or civil action or suit, but an investigation by the court into the conduct of one of its own officers, and that, therefore, while the complaint should be sufficiently informing to advise the . . . attorney of the charges made against [her], it is not required that it be marked by the same precision of statement, or conformity to the recognized formalities or technicalities of pleadings, as are expected in complaints in civil or criminal actions.’’ (Internal quo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
Ed. 2d 39 (2006); accord Rules of Professional Con- duct, preamble. ‘‘[A] hearing such as this is not the trial of a criminal or civil action or suit, but an investigation by the court into the conduct of one of its own officers, and that, therefore, while the complaint should be sufficiently informing to advise the . . . attorney of the charges made against [her], it is not required that it be marked by the same precision of statement, or conformity to the recognized formalities or technicalities of pleadings, as are expected in complaints in civil or criminal actions.’’ (Internal quo…
discussed
Cited "see"
D'Attilo v. Statewide Grievance Comm.
These materials shall constitute the panel's record in the case." Practice Book § 2-34A(b)(1) provides in relevant part: "When, after a determination of no probable cause by a grievance panel, a complaint is forwarded to the statewide grievance committee because it contains an allegation that the respondent committed a crime, and the statewide grievance committee or a reviewing committee determines that a hearing shall be held concerning the complaint pursuant to Section 2-35(c), the disciplinary counsel shall present the matter to such committee." We note that, although the trial court addre…
discussed
Cited "see"
Disciplinary Counsel v. Sporn
After considering the factors set forth in the American Bar Association's Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (ABA factors); see Burton v. Mottolese , 267 Conn. 1 , 55-56, 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004) ; the court on September 18, 2015, suspended the respondent from the practice of law for two years.
cited
Cited "see"
Disciplinary Counsel v. Parnoff
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 55 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lopez ex rel. Reyes v. Trujillo
See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 , 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2421 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004). “[T]he basis on which jurisdiction depends must be alleged affirmatively and distinctly and cannot be established argumentatively or by mere inference.” Getty, 841 F.2d at 1259 (citing Illinois Cent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 , 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2421 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004).
examined
Cited "see"
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton
(3×)
See Sullivan v. Monroe, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. CV 00-0370545 (November 2, 2001) (disbarring same defendant on grounds that she had violated several Rules of Professional Conduct by, inter alia, engaging in unauthorized legal representation of several individuals and making misrepresentations to court), writ dismissed, Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Massey v. Town of Branford
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-50 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Gambardella v. Apple Health Care, Inc.
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 40 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. Maturo
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 44 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158, L.
cited
Cited "see"
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tarro v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 40 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (noting that fact finder “is best able to judge the credibility of the witnesses and to draw necessary inferences therefrom” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
NL Industries, Inc. v. OneBeacon America Insurance
See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 , 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2421 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004). “[T]he basis on which jurisdiction depends must be alleged affirmatively and distinctly and cannot be established argumentatively or by mere inference.” Getty, 841 F.2d at 1259 (citing Illinois Cent.
cited
Cited "see"
Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance Committee
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-52 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
John H. Carney & Associates v. State Farm Lloyds
See Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LP, 355 F.3d 853, 857 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2421 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004) (citing Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 , 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bunker
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Burton
(2×)
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004). [1] When the committee presents an attorney for misconduct, the court is authorized by Practice Book § 2-47 to "render a judgment dismissing the complaint or imposing discipline as follows: reprimand, suspension for a period of time, disbarment or such other discipline as the court deems appropriate." Because the court in Mottolese already had taken into consideration each and every act of misconduct alleged in the presentment at hand in its disbarment of the defe…
cited
Cited "see"
Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance Committee
See Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 49-52 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cohen v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Rev. 3 , 28 (2002) (‘‘[r]ule 3.3 (a) often overlaps with [r]ule 8.4 (c),’’ and ‘‘lawyer [who] violates [r]ule 3.3 (a) generally violates [r]ule 8.4 (c)’’); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 51–52, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (holding that trial court reasonably concluded that plaintiff violated rule 3.3 (a) (1) and that same conduct supported conclusion that plaintiff violated rule 8.4 (3)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCullough v. Rocky Hill
See General Statutes § 1-24a (requiring affiant to ‘‘swear to the truth of the document or writing before any proper officer’’); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1 , 46 n.47, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (noting that ‘‘the document filed by the plaintiff was not, in actuality, an affidavit because the contents were not sworn to and did not satisfy the requirements of a proper affidavit’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S. Ct. 2422 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Starboard Resources, Inc. v. Henry
Co. , supra, 668 F.3d at 75 ; see also Burton v. Mottolese , 267 Conn. 1 , 49, 835 A.2d 998 (2003) ( "adverse rulings do not amount to evidence of bias"), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1073 , 124 S.Ct. 2422 , 158 L.Ed.2d 983 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Perez
We traditionally have recognized that the right to appellate review of an order imposing sanctions is part and parcel of those due process rights accorded to a disciplined attorney.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Briggs v. McWeeny, 260 Conn. 296, 312 , 796 A.2d 516 (2002); see also Burton v. Mottolese, 267 Conn. 1, 19 , 835 A.2d 998 (2003) (“[b]ecause a license to practice law is a vested property interest and disciplinary proceedings are adversary proceedings of a quasi-criminal nature, an attorney subject to discipline is entitled to due process of law” [intern…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Runningen
v.
Kentucky
v.
Kentucky
03-1416.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
Published
RUNNINGEN
v.
KENTUCKY.
No. 03-1416.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 1, 2004.
1
Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.