green
Positive treatment
Trending · 188 recent citers
17.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Roberto A. v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Best
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 101 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (holding that autopsy photographs were admissible in penalty phase of capital case because they ‘‘were relevant to the state’s claim that the defendant had intentionally inflicted extreme psychological pain or torture on [the victim] beyond that necessary to accomplish the killing’’ (emphasis omitted)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Audibert v. Halle
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 131 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCleese
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 24 n.13, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McCleese
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 24 n.13, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Burton
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 45 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (determining that finding of voluntary consent to search not clearly erro- neous where officers requested permission to enter premises and did not use loud or threatening language or point their guns at anyone), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gray-Brown
See State v. Reynolds , 264 Conn. 1 , 45, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 1614 , 158 L.Ed.2d 254 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Outlaw
In the absence of contrary evidence, "[j]udges are presumed to know the law ... and to apply it correctly." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Harlow P. , 146 Conn. App. 664 , 674 n.3, 78 A.3d 281 , cert. denied, 310 Conn. 957 , 81 A.3d 1183 (2013) ; accord State v. Reynolds , 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, *225 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 1614 , 158 L.Ed.2d 254 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Castillo
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 54, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 1614 , 158 L.Ed.2d 254 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 232–33, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Albino
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 183 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘it generally is improper for the state to argue that the jurors’ oath obligates them to return a particular verdict because such language poses a risk of diverting the jury from its duty of deciding the case on the basis of the evidence and the applicable law’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Harlow P.
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gallo
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 33-34 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 30 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Harvey v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 55 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Azukas
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 43 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cabezudo
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 43 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Black Rock Yacht Club, Inc.
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 70 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ross
(2×)
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 232-33 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Ross
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 226-34 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
(2×)
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 226-34 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Tarnowsky v. Socci
See State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 79 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dabate
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 215 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. King
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[i]n the absence of any evidence to the con- trary, ‘[j]udges are presumed to know the law . . . and to apply it correctly’ ’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. King
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[i]n the absence of any evidence to the con- trary, ‘[j]udges are presumed to know the law . . . and to apply it correctly’ ’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robles
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[j]udges are presumed to know the law’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robles
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[i]n the absence of any evidence to the contrary, [j]udges are presumed to know the law . . . and to apply it correctly’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. Northeast Helicopters Flight Services, LLC
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 135 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[w]e ordinarily do not read statutes so as to render parts of them superfluous or meaningless’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dunn v. Northeast Helicopters Flight Services, LLC
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 135 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[w]e ordinarily do not read statutes so as to render parts of them superfluous or meaningless’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Silva
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 131 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (‘‘[i]n the absence of a showing that the jury failed or declined to follow the court’s instructions, we presume that it heeded them’’), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alicea
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 131 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alicea
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 131 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruiz
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 42 n.30, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (reviewing court may consider testimony adduced both at trial and at suppression hearing when determining propriety of trial court’s ruling on motion to suppress), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reyes
As this court previously has explained, "bypass doctrines permitting the review of unpreserved claims such as [ Golding ] ... and plain error [claims], are generally adequate to protect the rights of the defendant and the integrity of the judicial system .... [T]he supervisory authority of this state's appellate courts is not intended to serve as a bypass to the bypass, permitting the review of unpreserved claims of case specific error-constitutional or not-that are not otherwise amenable to relief under Golding or the plain error doctrine." (Citations omitted; footnote omitted; internal quota…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casiano v. Commissioner of Correction
Section 53a-35b provides: ‘‘A sentence of life imprisonment means a definite sentence of sixty years, unless the sentence is life imprisonment without the possibility of release, imposed pursuant to subparagraph (A) or (B) of subdivision (1) of section 53a-35a, in which case the sentence shall be imprison- ment for the remainder of the defendant’s natural life.’’ As Justice Zarella observes in his dissent in the present case, it is well established that this court defers ‘‘to the broad authority that legislatures possess in determining the types and limits of punishment for crime…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Andrews
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 187 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (pros- ecutor may point out egregious nature of conduct under consideration), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Campbell
See State v. Latour, 276 Conn. 399, 412 , 886 A.2d 404 (2005); see also State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 60 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Richard S.
In the absence of an articulation, we read the record in a manner to support the judgment of the trial court. “[W]e do not presume error; the trial court’s ruling is entitled to the reasonable presumption that it is correct unless the party challenging the ruling has satisfied its burden demonstrating the contrary.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Baker, 50 Conn. App. 268 , 275 n.5, 718 A.2d 450 , cert. denied, 247 Conn. 937 , 722 A.2d 1216 (1998); see also State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 29 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (“[i]n the absence of any evidence to the contrary, [j]…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Diaz
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 215 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) ([exercise of supervisory powers is] an extraordinary remedy to be invoked only when circumstances are such that the issue at hand, while not rising to the level of a constitutional violation, is nonetheless of utmost seriousness, not only for the integrity of a particular trial but also for the perceived fairness of the judicial system as a whole), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 1614 , 158 L.Ed.2d 254 (2004)." [11] (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ledbetter, 275 Conn. 534, 577-78 , 881 A.2d 290 (2005), ce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kendall
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 30 n.21, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert, denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Zapata
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 106 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bozelko
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1 , 116 n.109, 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wallace
We review the record in its entirety and are not limited to the evidence before the trial court at the time the ruling was made on the motion to suppress.” (Internal quota *268 tion marks omitted.) State v. Whitaker, 215 Conn. 739, 742 , 578 A.2d 1031 (1990); see also State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 51 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lawrence
See, e.g State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 47 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (rejecting federal constitutional requirement that, for seizure to occur, there must be submission by defendant to assertion of authority or use of force by police), cert, denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fauci
Moreover, because the jury is aware that the prosecutor has prepared and presented the case and consequently, may have access to matters not in evidence ... it is likely to infer that such matters precipitated the personal opinions.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Thompson, 266 Conn. 440, 462 , 832 *36 A.2d 626 (2003); see also State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 163 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003), cert, denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Evans
Id. at 510-11 ; see also State v. Voits, 186 Or App 643, 663 , 64 P3d 1156 , rev den, 336 Or 17 (2003), cert den, 541 US 908 (2004) (curative instruction sufficient to remedy prejudice resulting from prosecutor’s passing reference during opening argument to the defendant’s pretrial incarceration); State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 270-71 , 971 P2d 879 , cert den, 527 US 1042 (1999) (mention of allegation that the defendant had committed sexual abuse did not necessitate mistrial where trial court immediately gave a curative instruction); State v. Wilson, 69 Or App 569, 573 , 687 P2d 800 (1984)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Warholic
First, “we continue to adhere to the well established maxim that defense counsel’s failure to object to the prosecutor’s argument when it was made suggests that defense counsel did not believe that it was unfair in light of the record of the case at the time.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Thompson, supra, 266 Conn. 483 ; see also State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 207 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (“[i]nasmuch as defense counsel had heard the comments of the state’s attorney when they were made, defense counsel was in a position to assess what impact, if any, the comments may …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brunetti
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 42 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) ("[u]nder the exclusionary rule, evidence must be suppressed if it is found to be the fruit of prior police illegality" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S.Ct. 1614 , 158 L.Ed.2d 254 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ledbetter
See, e.g., State v. Reynolds, 264 Conn. 1, 215 , 836 A.2d 224 (2003) (“ ‘[the exercise of our supervisory powers is] an extraordinary remedy to be invoked only when circumstances are such that the issue at hand, while not rising to the level of a constitutional violation, is nonetheless of utmost seriousness, not only for the integrity of a particular trial but also for the perceived fairness of the judicial system as a whole’ ”), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 908 , 124 S. Ct. 1614 , 158 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Padua
Indeed, such a scenario would incentivize prosecutorial manipulation of the appellate process: the state, faced with two such valid claims, and recognizing the validity of both, would be well-advised to confess error on the trial error claim and thereby gain the opportunity to fill any evidentiary gaps at the second trial that it left open in the first trial. 3 Sound appellate policy and fundamental fairness require that we structure our appellate process so as to avoid these results. 4 We ordinarily invoke our supervisory powers to enunciate a rule that is not constitutionally required but th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ealoms
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-8221.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 2004.
Published
EALOMS
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.
No. 03-8221.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 8, 2004.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.