green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodgers v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) (We have previously rejected claims under Apprendi and Ring in cases involving the aggravating factor of a previous conviction of a felony involving violence.), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holland v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) ("We have previously rejected claims under Apprendi and Ring in cases involving the aggravating factor of a previous conviction of a felony involving violence."), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Floyd v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) ("We have previously rejected claims under Apprendi [ v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)] and Ring in cases involving the aggravating factor of a previous conviction of a felony involving violence."), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 47 (Fla.2003) (holding the death sentence proportional for the first-degree murder conviction where the aggravators included HAC, prior violent felony conviction, and robbery/pecuniary gain and the court found twelve nonstatutory mitigating circumstances), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); Butler v. State, 842 So.2d 817, 833 (Fla.2003) (holding the death sentence proportional for the first-degree murder conviction where only the HAC aggravator was found); Singleton v. State, 783 So.2d 970, 979 (Fla.2001) (holding the death s…
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 56 (Fla.2003) (Anstead, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crain v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003), cert denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (stating that prior violent felony aggravator based on contemporaneous crimes charged by indictment and on which defendant was found guilty by unanimous jury "clearly satisfies the mandates of the United States and Florida Constitutions"), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walls v. State
See, e.g., Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) (noting rejection of Ring claims in a number of cases involving a prior-conviction aggravator), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); Grim v. State, 841 So.2d 455, 465 (Fla.) (explaining that defendant was not entitled to relief under Ring where aggravating circumstances of multiple convictions for prior violent felonies and contemporaneous felony of sexual battery were unanimously found by jury), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrell v. State
See, e.g., Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) (noting rejection of Ring claims in a number of cases involving a prior-conviction aggravator), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); Grim v. State, 841 So.2d 455, 465 (Fla.) (explaining that defendant was not entitled to relief under Ring where aggravating circumstances of multiple convictions for prior violent felonies and contemporaneous *180 felony of sexual battery were unanimously found by jury), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 892 , 124 S.Ct. 230 , 157 L.Ed.2d 166 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winkles v. State
See, e.g., Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003) ("We have previously rejected claims under Apprendi and Ring in cases involving the aggravating factor of a previous conviction of a felony involving violence."), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); Kormondy v. State, 845 So.2d 41, 54 (Fla.) (" Ring does not require either notice of the aggravating factors that the State will present at sentencing or a special verdict form indicating the aggravating factors found by the jury."), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 950 , 124 S.Ct. 392 , 157 L.Ed.2d 283 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pinson
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-8872.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 2004.
Published
PINSON
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.
No. 03-8872.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 19, 2004.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.