Running v. Oregon, 543 U.S. 1005 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Running v. Oregon, 543 U.S. 1005 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Running v. Kelly (orctapp, 2020-09-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Running v. Kelly
Or. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Running, 336 Or 545 , 87 P3d 661 , cert den, 543 US 1005 (2004) (setting forth facts underlying petitioner’s convictions).
discussed Cited "see" Revis v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See McNabb v. State, 887 So.2d 929, 971 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), affirmed, 887 So.2d 998 (Ala.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 606 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004) (" ' “[T]estimony that may be inadmissible may be rendered harmless by prior or subsequent lawful testimony to the same effect or from which the same facts can be inferred.” ’ See also Dawson v. State, 675 So.2d 897, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), affirmed, 675 So.2d 905 (Ala.1996) ('The erroneous admission of evidence that is merely cumulative is harmless error.'); and Thompson v. State, 527 So.2d 777, 780 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) ('Testi…
cited Cited "see" McNabb v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See McNabb v. Alabama , 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 606 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lewis
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Robinson, 367 F.3d 278, 285-86 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 623 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004); cf. Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir.1986).
cited Cited "see" Chavez v. Estep
10th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ceballos-Martinez, 387 F.3d 1140, 1143 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 624 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dotch v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Key v. State, 891 So.2d 353, 368 (Ala.Crim.App.2002), affirmed, 891 So.2d 384 (Ala.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 608 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004) (holding that Key would not have been entitled to relief on his claim that § 13A-5^40(a)(17) is unconstitutionally vague and arbitrary and that “to punish a defendant whose victim was sitting in a car differently from a defendant whose victim stumbled away from a car violated equal-protection principles” because this Court “has previously considered and rejected the constitutional arguments” raised by Key).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Solomon
W.D. Pa. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Allen, 406 F.3d at 943 (“We therefore conclude that the Fifth Amendment requires at least one statutory aggravating factor and the mens rea requirement to be found by the grand jury and charged in the indictment”); see also Robinson, 367 F.3d at 278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1005 , 125 S.Ct. 623 , 160 L.Ed.2d 466 (2004); United States v. Higgs, 353 F.3d 281, 298 (4th Cir.2003); United States v. Quinones, 313 F.3d 49 , 53 n. 1 (2d Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 1051 , 124 S.Ct. 807 , 157 L.Ed.2d 702 (2003) 3 The Court agrees with the reasoning of these courts and finds that…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Running
v.
Oregon
04-6336.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2004.
543 U.S. 1005
Published

543 U.S. 1005

RUNNING
v.
OREGON.

No. 04-6336.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 29, 2004.

1

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 336 Ore. 545, 87 P. 3d 661.