green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
W. v. Paley
See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 2004) (holding that an argument was preserved for review in light of intervening Supreme Court precedent when appellant conceded the argument was foreclosed by circuit precedent but raised it in his brief only to “preserve it for further review”), cert. granted, vacated on other grounds, Pineiro v. United States, 543 U.S. 1101 (2005). 22 Perez v. Sturgis Pub.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Ward
See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 466 (5th Cir.2004) (noting that § 841(b)(1)(C) establishes maximum sentences for any amount of cocaine less than 500 grams), vacated on other grounds by Pineiro v. United States, 543 U.S. 1101 , 125 S.Ct. 1003 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1006 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fields
(2×)
See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 468-69 (5th Cir. 2004), vacated, 543 U.S. 1101 , 125 S.Ct. 1003 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1006 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Julian Rodriguez-Mesa
See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir.2004) (holding that “Blakely does not extend to the federal Guidelines”), vacated, 543 U.S. 1101 , 125 S.Ct. 1003 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1006 (2005). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taiwo
See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465 (5th Cir.2004), vacated, 543 U.S. 1101 , 125 S.Ct. 1003 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1006 (2005), remanded to 410 F.3d 282 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zimmerman
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-5239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2005.
Published
ZIMMERMAN
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-5239.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 24, 2005.
1
C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 88 Fed. Appx. 977; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.