green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
20.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Woodmore
the objections by the co-defendants were clearly not made on behalf of , and cannot now use the objections of his co-defendants to cure his own failure to object.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dermen
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1042, 1048 (10th Cir. 2004), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 543 U.S. 1109 (2005), and opinion reinstated in part, 147 F. App’x 32 (10th Cir. 2005) (affirming the district court’s decision to admit summary testimony and charts from a non-expert witness, a law enforcement officer, in a “particularly complex” drug case, where the witness “present[ed] summary testimony and exhibits regarding the activities of the alleged conspiracy and the amounts of drugs for which each defendant was responsible”); see also United States v. Proctor, 166 F.3d …
cited
Cited "see"
In the Interest of A.W. and T.W., Minor Children
See United States v. Gatewood , 370 F.3d 1055 , 1060-62 (10th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds by 543 U.S. 1109 (2005) ; United States v. Bentham , 414 F. Supp. 2d 472 , 473-74 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
(2×)
See United States v. Ray , 370 F.3d 1039 , 1046 (10th Cir. 2004) (noting that Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which governs expert testimony, doesn't apply to summary testimony), vacated on other grounds , 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Malewicka
See United States v. Cassano, 372 F.3d 868, 878-79 (7th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1018 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1037 (2005) (citing United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)). (“[I]it is unlikely, to the point of absurdity, that it was pure coincidence that all fifty-one checks cashed by [defendant] were in denominations under $10,000.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Irving
(2×)
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039 , 1043 n. 3 (10th Cir.2004) ("Our ruling today is limited specifically to the sole issue raised on this appeal (i.e., the preservation of alleged instructional error when the complaining party neither offered the instruction nor offered an individualized objection) [and] does not [address] the issue of preservation with regard to evidentiary objections."), rev'd on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wardell
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1045 (10th Cir. 2004) (applying rule even when government introduced evidence of murder and torture by alleged coconspirators in complex, 23-day trial involving drug conspiracy charges), vacated in part on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 (2005); United States v. Emmons, 24 F.3d 1210, 1218-19 (10th Cir. 1994) (applying rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wardell
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1045 (10th Cir.2004) (applying rule even when government introduced evidence of murder and torture by alleged coconspirators in complex, 23-day trial involving drug conspiracy charges), vacated in part on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005); United States v. Emmons, 24 F.3d 1210, 1218-19 (10th Cir.1994) (applying rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wardell
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1045 (10th Cir.2004) (applying rule even when government introduced evidence of murder and torture by alleged coconspirators in complex, 23-day trial involving drug conspiracy charges), vacated in part on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005); United States v. Emmons, 24 F.3d 1210, 1218-19 (10th Cir.1994) (applying rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neha
See United *815 States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1045 (10th Cir.2004) (“[Since] the government introduced significant evidence of [the defendant’s] guilt at trial ... [the defendant] has failed to make a ‘strong showing of prejudice.’”), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hong Son Nguyen
See United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1045 (10th Cir.2004) vacated on other grounds by Ray v. United States, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelica Lopez
(2×)
See United States v. Haire, 371 F.3d 833, 838 (D.C.Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1014 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1038 (2005); United States v. Turner, 936 F.2d 221, 226 (6th Cir.1991); United States v. Leal, 831 F.2d 7, 9-10 (1st Cir.1987) (per curiam); United States v. Sandini 803 F.2d 123, 128 (3d Cir.1986); United States v. MacDougall, 790 F.2d 1135, 1150-51 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Netz, 758 F.2d 1308, 1312 (8th Cir.1985) (per curiam); United States v. Corbin, 734 F.2d 643, 652 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Godwin, 546 F.2d 145, 146-48 (5th Cir.1977); United…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Lou Meyer
See United States v. Gatewood, 370 F.3d 1055, 1060-62 (10th Cir. 2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Lou Meyer
See United States v. Gatewood, 370 F.3d 1055, 1060-62 (10th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1013 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1036 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gatewood
See United States v. Gatewood, 370 F.3d 1055 (10th Cir.2004), vacated, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S. Ct. 1013 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1036 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bonilla
See Bonilla v. United States, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1015 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1037 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Worley
See Worley v. United States, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1019 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1037 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cassano, Angelo
See Cassano v. United States, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1018 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1037 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maurice Henderson
See, e.g., United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1046 (10th Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005); United States v. Johnson, 54 F.3d 1150, 1156-57 (4th Cir.1995). 20 . 54 F.3d at 1159 . 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Savane Williams v. State of Indiana
Accordingly, we conclude that Detective Dagy’s testimony did not relate any out-of-court statement made by Thomas and did not constitute hearsay.4 See id.; see also 4 Williams also argues that, if Thomas’s conduct of handing the cocaine to Detective Dagy was not an assertion that the cocaine came from Williams, then the State failed to properly establish the first step in 10 United States v. Cassano, 372 F.3d 868, 882-83 (7th Cir. 2004) (holding that witness’s testimony that two men did not help him cash checks was not hearsay because their conduct of not helping the witness was non-asse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cook
See also United States v. Gatewood, 370 F.3d 1055, 1061 (10th Cir.2004) (holding that in sentencing "hearsay may be considered as long as it bears some minimal indicia of reliability”) vacated on other grounds by Gatewood v. United States, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 1013 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1036 (2005); United States v. Knox, 124 F.3d 1360, 1366 (10th Cir.1997) (holding "evidence legitimately considered at sentencing ... may include hearsay testimony containing only minimal indicia of reliability”); see generally U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3(a) (2007) ("In resolving any dispute concerning a factor important…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thompson
See, e.g., United States v. *859 Mann, 884 F.2d 532, 539 (10th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Ray, 370 F.3d 1039, 1046 (10th Cir.2004) (explaining that “because tax cases often require the presentation of substantial and complex documentation and the technical analyses of these materials by tax experts,” summaries are often admissible in tax cases under Rule 1006), vacated on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1109 , 125 S.Ct. 995 , 160 L.Ed.2d 1035 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gatewood
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-6266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2005.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
GATEWOOD
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-6266.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 24, 2005.
1
C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 370 F. 3d 1055; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, ante, p. 220.