In Re Adams, 543 U.S. 808 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Adams, 543 U.S. 808 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (txsd, 2014-07-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz
S.D. Tex. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Although an appellee may argue any ground available to support affirmance of a judgment, he may not argue for a ruling that would expand his legal rights under the judgment that was entered unless he raises it by cross-appeal.” Weaver v. Tex. Capital Bank, N.A., 660 F.3d 900, 905 (5th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2103 , 182 L.Ed.2d 868 (2012); see also Castellano v. Fragozo, 352 F.3d 939, 960 (5th Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 808 , 125 S.Ct. 31 , 33, 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Adams
03-1596.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 808
Published

543 U.S. 808

IN RE ADAMS;

No. 03-1596.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 2004.

1

Petitions for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.