green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
H.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States
although the individual steps of the transaction had a legitimate business reason, the transaction must be treated as a single unit and judged by its end result
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Marsan
See State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 440 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stewart
(2×)
A statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied "if it fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" or "if it authorizes or even encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement." Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 732 , 120 S.Ct. 2480 , 147 L.Ed.2d 597 (2000); accord United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 132 (2d Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Doyle
See State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 436 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, *12 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayden v. Pataki
See United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 136 (2d Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004) (reasoning that when a statute is adopted for the purpose of overruling a Supreme Court decision which in turn overruled previous law on the subject, Congress likely intended to reinstate the previous law). 115 The case law that Congress sought to reinstate, so far as we can tell, involved cases in which "designedly or otherwise, an apportionment scheme, under the circumstances of a particular case, would operate to minimize or cancel out the voting strengt…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayden v. Pataki
See United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 136 (2d Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004) (reasoning that when a statute is adopted for the purpose of overruling a Supreme Court decision which in turn overruled previous law on the subject, Congress likely intended to reinstate the previous law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
See Kalama Servs., Inc. v. Dir., OWCP, 354 F.3d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir.) (court must ensure that Board properly reviewed ALJ's factual findings for substantial evidence), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 36 , 160 L.Ed.2d 12 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Healy Tibbitts Builders, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
See Kalama Servs., Inc. v. Dir., OWCP, 354 F.3d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir.) (court must ensure that Board properly reviewed ALJ’s factual findings for substantial evidence), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 36 , 160 L.Ed.2d 12 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Walters
See State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 434-35 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Paradis
See State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 425 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fortis, Inc. v. United States
See Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. v. Comm’r, 347 F.3d 173, 180-81 (6th Cir.2004) (finding that revenue rulings, unlike treasury regulations, do not involve IRS’s ability make rules with force of law and, consistent with Christensen and Mead , should be afforded deference depending on factors articulated in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161 , 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944)), cert. filed, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 37 , 160 L.Ed.2d 12 (2004); see also ABIC, 308 F.Supp.2d at 1370-72 (discussing deference owed to revenue rulings after Christensen and Mead ). 14 In any event, even under the…
discussed
Cited "see"
L) United States v. Sattar (Stewart; Yousry) 1
As we shall see, the charges in the superseding 26 indictment do not pose this risk. -47- 1 A statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied "if it 2 fails to provide people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable 3 opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" or "if it 4 authorizes or even encourages arbitrary and discriminatory 5 enforcement." Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703, 732 (2000); accord 6 United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 132 (2d Cir. 2003) (en 7 banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Russo
See, e.g., State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414 , 424–25, 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sayles
As a general matter, ‘‘the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stem- ming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against [self-incrimina- tion].’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Don- ald, 325 Conn. 346, 355 , 157 A.3d 1134 (2017); see also State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 420 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sayles
As a general matter, ‘‘the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stem- ming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against [self-incrimina- tion].’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Don- ald, 325 Conn. 346, 355 , 157 A.3d 1134 (2017); see also State v. Turner, 267 Conn. 414, 420 , 838 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S. Ct. 36 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Battelle Memorial Institute v. Dicecca
See Smith, Hinchman & Grylls, 380 U.S. at 363-64 , 85 S.Ct. 1012 ; O’Keeffe, 338 F.2d at 325 ; O’Hearne, 335 F.2d at 70-71; Self, 305 F.2d at 702-03 ; Pillsbury, 203 F.2d at 643 ; see also Kalama Servs., Inc. v. Office of Workers’ Comp. *221 Programs, 354 F.3d 1085, 1092 (9th Cir.2004), ce rt. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 36 , 160 L.Ed.2d 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Saathoff
E.g., United States v. Waymer, 55 F.3d 564 (11th Cir.1995) (school board member failed to disclose that he received $200,000 in kickbacks on school contracts with particular vendor); see also United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 139-40 (2nd Cir.2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004) (collecting bribery and kickback cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
See, e.g., Spiller v. White, 352 F.3d 235, 241 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 34 , 160 L.Ed.2d 11 (2004); P.E.A.C.H. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 87 F.3d 1242, 1248-49 (11th Cir.1996) (upholding Corps determination that individual permit for a highway would not result in significant impact because permit mandated mitigation for impacts to wetlands and historic district). 54 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cohen
See also United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124, 129 (2d Cir.2003) (in banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sorich
See Hausmann, 345 F.3d 952 ; see also, United States v. Rybicki, 354 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.2003)(en banc), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 809 , 125 S.Ct. 32 , 160 L.Ed.2d 10 (2004); United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728 (5th Cir.1997), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1028 , 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997); United States v. Welch, 327 F.3d 1081 (10th Cir.2003), United States v. Gray, 96 F.3d 769 (5th Cir.1996), cert denied, 520 U.S. 1129 , 117 S.Ct. 1275 , 137 L.Ed.2d 351 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hamilton
v.
Collett
v.
Collett
03-1414.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 809
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
HAMILTON
v.
COLLETT ET AL.
No. 03-1414.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 83 Fed. Appx. 634.