McFall v. Ward, 543 U.S. 818 (2004). · Go Syfert
McFall v. Ward, 543 U.S. 818 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“tattoos may have reflected defendant's inner thoughts”
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Hinds (mass, 2021-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Hinds
Mass. · 2021 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
tattoos may have reflected defendant's inner thoughts
discussed Cited "see" People v. Havrish
NY · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Our Court has applied the Schmerber analysis on a number of occasions, holding that field sobriety tests conducted during a traffic stop were the equivalent of real or physical evidence not protected under the Fifth Amendment (People v Hager, 69 NY2d 141 [1987]; see People v Berg, 92 NY2d 701 [1999]) and that a defendant could not rely on the privilege to avoid compliance with a court order requiring him to display his upper body tattoos (see People v Slavin, 1 NY3d 392 [2004], cert denied 543 US 818 [2004]).
cited Cited "see" Policky v. City of Seward, Neb.
D. Neb. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bankhead v. Knickrehm, 360 F.3d 839, 844 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 818 , 125 S.Ct. 57 , 160 L.Ed.2d 26 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re the Estate of Astor
N.Y. Sur. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
The privilege does not extend to the compelled production of incriminating documents unless the individual asserting the privilege was compelled to create the document (see Fisher v United States, supra; see also People v Slavin, 1 NY3d 392 , cert denied 543 US 818 [2004], citing United States v Hubbell, 530 US 27 [2000]).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Kimes
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Therefore, the notebooks could not be said to “contain compelled testimonial evidence.” ( Hubbell, supra at 36 ; see also People v Slavin, 1 NY3d 392, 399 [2004], cert denied 543 US 818 [2004].) Further, Kimes did not meet her burden of establishing that the notebooks were delivered to her attorney for legal advice.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McFall
v.
Ward
03-1671.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
543 U.S. 818

543 U.S. 818

McFALL
v.
WARD.

No. 03-1671.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 2004.

1

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 277 Ga. 649, 593 S. E. 2d 340.