green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Matter of K. F., a Juvenile
An order granting a new trial reinstates the case on the trial court’s docket “the same as though no trial had been had.” Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz , 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. den’d) (“When a motion for new trial is granted, the original judgment is set aside and the parties may proceed without prejudice from previous proceedings.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 820 , 125 S. Ct. 69 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Matter of K. F., a Juvenile
An order granting a new trial reinstates the case on the trial court’s docket “the same as though no trial had been had.” Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz, 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. den’d) (“When a motion for new trial is granted, the original judgment is set aside and the parties may proceed without prejudice from previous proceedings.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 820 , 125 S. Ct. 69 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Matter of K. F., a Juvenile
An order granting a new trial reinstates the case on the trial court’s docket “the same as though no trial had been had.” Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz , 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. den’d) (“When a motion for new trial is granted, the original judgment is set aside and the parties may proceed without prejudice from previous proceedings.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 820 , 125 S. Ct. 69 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Don R. Stewart v. Mahmmadu Khan
However, an order granting a new trial reinstates the case on the trial court’s docket “the same as though no trial had been had.” Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys. , 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see also Markowitz v. Markowitz , 118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (“When a motion for new trial is granted, the original judgment is set aside and the parties may proceed without prejudice from previous proceedings.”), cert. denied , 543 U.S. 820 (2004). “[W]hen the trial court grants a motion for new trial, the court essentially wipes the sla…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douds
v.
Thompson
v.
Thompson
03-1697.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
Published
DOUDS ET AL.
v.
THOMPSON ET AL.
No. 03-1697.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 852 So. 2d 299.