Blanco v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 543 U.S. 962 (2004). · Go Syfert
Blanco v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 543 U.S. 962 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wood v. Dretke (txwd, 2005-08-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Wood v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the aedpa requires that we presume correct the state court's findings of fact unless the petitioner 'rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Prieto v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the aedpa requires that we presume correct the state court's findings of fact unless the petitioner 'rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.
discussed Cited "see" Mass v. Quarterman
W.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morrow v. Dretke, 367 F.3d 309, 315 (5th Cir.2004)(“The AEDPA requires that we presume correct the state court’s findings of fact unless the petitioner ‘rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.’ ”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 960 , 125 S.Ct. 421 , 160 L.Ed.2d 325 (2004); Pondexter v. Dretke, 346 F.3d 142 , 146 & 149 (5th Cir.2003)(holding, pursuant to § 2254(e)(1), state court findings of fact are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting that presumption by clear and convincing evidence), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1045 , 124 S.Ct. 2…
discussed Cited "see" Watts v. Quarterman
W.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morrow v. Dretke, 367 F.3d 309, 315 (5th Cir.2004) (“The AEDPA requires that we presume correct the state court’s findings of fact unless the petitioner ‘rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.' ”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 960 , 125 S.Ct. 421 , 160 L.Ed.2d 325 (2004); Pondexter v. Dretke, 346 F.3d 142 , 146 & 149 (5th Cir.2003)(holding, pursuant to § 2254(e)(1), state court findings of fact are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting that presumption by clear and convincing evidence), ce rt. denied, 541 U.S. 1045 , 124 S.Ct. 2…
cited Cited "see" Rodriguez v. State
Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Griffin v. State, 866 So.2d 1, 14 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 962 , 125 S.Ct. 413 , 160 L.Ed.2d 328 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morrow v. Dretke, 367 F.3d 309 , 315 *470 (5th Cir.2004)(“The AEDPA requires that we presume correct the state court’s findings of fact unless the petitioner ‘rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.’ ”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 421 , 160 L.Ed.2d 325 (2004); Pondexter v. Dretke, 346 F.3d 142, 146, 149 (5th Cir.2003) (holding that, pursuant to § 2254(e)(1), state court findings of fact are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting that presumption by clear and convincing evidence), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1045 , 12…
discussed Cited "see" Gutierrez v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Morrow v. Dretke, 367 F.3d 309, 315 (5th Cir.2004) (“The AEDPA requires that we presume correct the state court’s findings of fact unless the petitioner ‘rebuts the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.’ ”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 421 , 160 L.Ed.2d 325 (2004); Pondexter v. Dretke, 346 F.3d 142, 146, 149 (5th Cir.2003) (holding that, pursuant to § 2254(e)(1), state court findings of fact are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting that presumption by clear and convincing evidence), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1045 , 124 S.Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blanco
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
04-6013.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 2004.
543 U.S. 962

543 U.S. 962

BLANCO
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.

No. 04-6013.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 1, 2004.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.