green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pelum
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pflum
See United States v. May, 413 F.3d 841, 849 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tejeda-Fuentes
See United States v. LopezUrbina, 434 F.3d 750, 765 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maas
See United States v. Roche, 415 F.3d 614, 618 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 671 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3661 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abdallah
When the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, “the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see also United States v. Lopez-Urbina, 434 F.3d 750, 757 (5th Cir.) (applying Jackson), c e rt. denied, 546 U.S. 1024 , 126 S.Ct. 672 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nersesian
See, e.g., United States v. Roche, 415 F.3d 614, 619 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 671 , 163 L.Ed.2d 541 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earlen L. Brown, Jr.
Specifically, Booker “provide[s] no basis to question prior ... decisions that expressly approved the consideration of out-of-court statements at sentencing.” United States v. Martinez, 413 F.3d 239, 243 (2d Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Luciano, 414 F.3d 174, 179 (1st Cir.2005) (Booker did not alter “view that there is no Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses during the sentencing phase”). *944 We also note that courts have held that Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), in which the Supreme Court held that admission of testimonia…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lester
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 05-7029.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 2005.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.