Long Island Sav. Bank v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 38 (Fed. Cir. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
Long Island Sav. Bank v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 38 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
89 citation events (89 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of New Jersey v. Jermaine T. Wharton (njsuperctappdiv, 2025-09-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State of New Jersey v. Jermaine T. Wharton
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Moon, 512 F.3d A-2793-22 40 359, 361 (7th Cir.) ("That it may be to defendants' advantage to accept the hearsay version of evidence makes it problematic to entertain a Crawford [8] claim via the plain-error [standard] . . . ."), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 812 (2008); State v. Nyhammer, 197 N.J. 383, 413-14 (finding no Confrontation Clause violation where defendant chose "strategic course" not to cross- examine victim about accusations in videotaped interview), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 831 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bryden R. Williams (070388) (2×)
N.J. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Moon, 512 F.3d 359, 361 (7th Cir.) (“That it may be to defendants’ advantage to accept the hearsay version of evidence makes it problematic to entertain a Crawford claim via the plain-error [standard].... ”), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 812 , 129 S.Ct. 39 -40, 172 L.Ed.2d 19 (2008); State v. Nyhammer, 197 N.J. 383, 413-14 , 963 A.2d 316 (finding no Confrontation Clause violation where defendant chose “strategic course” not to cross-examine victim about accusations in videotaped interview), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 831 , 130 S.Ct. 65 , 175 L.Ed.2d 48 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Elana Gordon
Mass. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Moon, 512 F.3d 359, 362 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 812 (2008) (raw results not "statements" and machine not "declarant" because "how could one cross-examine a gas chromatograph?"); United States v. Washington, 498 F.3d 225, 229-231 (4th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 934 (2009) (machine-generated data of chemical composition of defendant's blood were not hearsay statements); People v. Lopez, 55 Cal. 4th 569, 589-590 (2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1217 (2013) (noting that "the printout produced by the gas chromatograph machine, which was not hearsay, was pr…
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Julie L. Michaels (072106) (4×)
N.J. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Jenkins v. State, supra, 102 So. 3d at 1069 (approving supervisor’s expert testimony after review of gas chromatography results obtained by nontestifying analyst); see also United States v. Moon, 512 F.3d 359, 362 (7th Cir.) (“[H]ow could one cross-examine a gas chromatograph?”), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 812 , 129 S. Ct. 40 , 172 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The LONG ISLAND SAVINGS BANK, FSB
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 07-1234.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 6, 2008.
129 S. Ct. 38
Cited by 29 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.