Nalls v. Plattsmiere, 179 L. Ed. 2d 656 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Nalls v. Plattsmiere, 179 L. Ed. 2d 656 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (DP) Cowan v. Cates (caed, 2020-08-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" (DP) Cowan v. Cates
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robert 10 Wesley Cowan v. California, 563 U.S. 905 (2011). 11 On June 18, 2018, the California Supreme Court discharged its habeas order to show 12 cause directed to the Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation regarding 13 claimed juror misconduct.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Martinez
Mass. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vosburgh, 602 F.3d 512 , 527 & n.14 (3d Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 563 U.S. 905 (2011), and cases cited (noting “unique nature of the IP address assigned” to defendant on particular date made Internet activity on that date “fairly traceable” to specific ISP account and associated physical address); DOJ, Searching and Seizing Computers, supra at 65.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ricardo Vega
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: accord · confidence high
Although paragraph 14 of the PSR did not provide direct evidence that Vega personally possessed the other 34 firearms during the process of dividing the fruits of the burglary, we agree with the district court that “sufficient circumstantial evidence supported a finding of constructive or joint possession, if not actual possession.” United States v. Koskela, 86 F.3d 122, 127 (8th Cir.1996); accord United States v. McCraney, 612 F.3d 1057, 1065-66 (8th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1784 , 179 L.Ed.2d 656 (2011); Byas, 581 F.3d at 726 ; Smart, 501 F.3d at 867 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Randeep Mann
8th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCraney, 612 F.3d 1057, 1065 (8th Cir.2010), cert. denied, Williams v. United States, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 1784 , 179 L.Ed.2d 656 (2011); United States v. Williams, 308 F.3d 833, 838-39 (8th Cir.2002).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Page
10th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bunton v. Atherton, 613 F.3d 973, 983 (10th Cir.2010), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1783 , 179 L.Ed.2d 656 (2011) (noting that prejudice element would not be satisfied because, even if witness testified, it was unclear if she would have been a credible witness); DeLozier, 531 F.3d at 1325 (decision not to call witness was not unreasonable because witness made incriminating statements in earlier interview and there was strong possibility that his testimony would not conform to his earlier statements).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Byrd v. Workman
10th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bunton v. Atherton, 613 F.3d 973, 982 (10th Cir.2010) (“[A]ssum[ing] ... that the [state court] unreasonably applied Strickland in determining that Johnson made a reasonable strategic decision to forego Bursie’s testimony, we would still be left to determine, de novo, whether [the Strickland standard was satisfied].”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1783 , 179 L.Ed.2d 656 (2011). 11 And, even under *1173 this more generous de novo standard, Mr. Byrd’s claim still fails.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence T. Nalls, Jr.
v.
Charles B. Plattsmiere
No. 10-1039.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 656
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 394 Fed. Appx. 90.