State v. Bolar, 94 P.3d 959 (Wash. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bolar, 94 P.3d 959 (Wash. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Paxton v. City of Bellingham (washctapp, 2005-09-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Paxton v. City of Bellingham
Wash. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
A party seeking a writ of mandamus must satisfy three requirements: (1) the party subject to the writ must be under a clear duty to act; (2) the petitioner must be "beneficially interested," and (3) the petitioner must not have a "plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." RCW 7.16.170; accord, Eugster v. City of Spokane, 118 Wash.App. 383, 402 , 76 P.3d 741 (2003), rev. denied, 151 Wash.2d 1027 , 94 P.3d 959 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
BOLAR
74743-1.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jun 2, 2004.
94 P.3d 959
Published

Disposition of petition for review denied.