California Codes
Cal. Civil Code § 1633.1 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This title may be cited as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2003–2026 · leading case: Espejo v. S. California Permanente Med. Grp., 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
Espejo v. S. California Permanente Med. Grp., 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “7, enacted in 1999 as part of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq., added by Stats.”
Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Grp., 232 Cal. App. 4th 836 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “7, enacted in 1999 as part of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq., added by Stats.”
People v. Billa, 79 P.3d 542 (Cal. 2003). “[Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act]; Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq. [Uniform Electronic Transactions Act].”
J.B.B. Inv. Partners, Ltd. v. Fair, 232 Cal. App. 4th 974 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “The trial court found that Fair’s printed name at the end of his e-mail where he had agreed to settlement terms set forth in an e-mail from plaintiffs’ counsel was an “electronic signature” within the meaning of California’s Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, §…”
Ni v. Slocum, 196 Cal. App. 4th 1636 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). “5 and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq.). Government Code section 16.”
Rickards v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 206 Cal. App. 4th 1523 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “) “An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person if it was the act of the person.”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (W. Va. 2016). “Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 -.17 (West Supp.”
Bayside Covenant Church v. Superior Court CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “7, enacted in 1999 as part of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq., added by Stats.”
Iyere v. Wise Auto Grp. (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “) Applying the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq.), the Fourth Appellate District held that the employer had not borne its burden of proving that the electronic signature was “the act of” the employee.”
LaCasse v. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “7, enacted in 1999 as part of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq., added by Stats.”
Park v. NMSI, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “According to NMSI, Chung’s email of October 23, 2019, which included “his full name, title, address, two phone numbers, email address, and webpage URL,” was all that was needed to satisfy the electronic signature requirement of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA)…”
Marriage of Turner CA2/6 (Cal. Ct. App. 2023). “Tyler complains that the trial court accepted his signature without ensuring that it complied with the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civ. Code, § 1633.1 et seq.; UETA). But Tyler did not raise this issue during the proceedings below.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.