Cal. Codes » Civil Code / DIVISION 2. PROPERTY / PART 2. REAL OR IMMOVABLE PROPERTY [[755.] - 945.5.] / TITLE 2. ESTATES IN REAL PROPERTY / CHAPTER 2.5. Mobilehome Residency Law / ARTICLE 8. Actions, Proceedings, and Penalties
California Codes

Cal. Civil Code § 798.85 (2026)

Actions, Proceedings, and Penalties

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any action arising out of the provisions of this chapter the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. A party shall be deemed a prevailing party for the purposes of this section if the judgment is rendered in his or her favor or where the litigation is dismissed in his or her favor prior to or during the trial, unless the parties otherwise agree in the settlement or compromise.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Rubin v. Green, 847 P.2d 1044 (Cal. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rubin v. Green, 847 P.2d 1044 (Cal. 1993). · cites it 2× “(Civ. Code, § 798.85; Code Civ. *1200 Proc.”
De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates, 94 Cal. App. 4th 890 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001). “2 Civil Code section 798.85 provides: “In any action arising out of the provisions of this chapter the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs .”
Robinson v. City of Yucaipa, 28 Cal. App. 4th 1506 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994). “Civil Code section 798.85 states, “In any action arising out of the provisions of this chapter the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.”
Pinto Lake M.H.People v. Cnty. of Santa Cruz, No. H050374 (Cal. Ct. App. July 28, 2023). · cites it 3× “The Association then moved for attorney fees under both the Mobilehome Residency Law (Civ. Code, § 798.85) and the private attorney general statute (Code Civ.”
Barton Props. v. City of Holtville, No. D067540 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2016). “After several demurrers and amendments to its cross-complaint, the City dismissed its causes of action for nuisance and negligence per se as to all Cross- 1 Civil Code section 798.85 provides: "In any action arising out of the provisions of the [Mobilehome Residency Law] the…”
Varney Ent. Grp. v. Avon Plastics, 61 Cal. App. 5th 222 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). “(a)(4) [‘“prevailing party”’ for purposes of costs award includes “a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered”]; Civ. Code, § 798.85 [in an action under the mobilehome residency law, a party may recover attorney fees after a voluntary dismissal]; Code Civ.”
LA Investments v. Spix, 290 Cal. Rptr. 3d 770 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “Knowing the MRL provides for attorney fees to the prevailing party (Civ. Code, § 798.85; see SC Manufactured Homes, Inc.”
LA Investments, LLC v. Spix, 75 Cal. App. 5th 1044 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022). “Knowing the MRL provides for attorney fees to the prevailing party (Civ. Code, § 798.85; see SC Manufactured Homes, Inc.”
Canyon View Ltd. v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, No. B311313 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2022). “(Civ. Code, § 798.85.) The court denied Canyon View’s initial motion for attorney fees on the basis that the Lakeview action did not arise out of the MRL, and that even if it did, no amount of attorney fees would be reasonable to award Canyon View in any event.”
Marriage of Terry, No. B334907 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 21, 2025). “(c)(6)), the 5 Mobilehome Residency Law (Civ. Code, § 798.85), and the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (Fam.”
Nat'l Merchants Assn. v. Com. Bank of Cal., No. B341687 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2026). “The Court of Appeal affirmed the attorney fee award, finding the tenant was not entitled to attorney fees for defending against the breach of contract claim, but was entitled to attorney fees for defending against the nuisance action, brought under the Mobilehome Residency Act.”
Willow Bend v. City of Holtville, No. D062980 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2014). “" (Civ. Code, § 798.85, italics added.) Although " '[a]n order granting or denying an award of attorney fees is generally reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review,' " the issue " ' "whether the criteria for an award of attorney fees and costs [under Civil Code,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.