(a)Whenever a work of fine art is sold and the seller resides in California or the sale takes place in California, the seller or the seller’s agent shall pay to the artist of such work of fine art or to such artist’s agent 5 percent of the amount of such sale. The right of the artist to receive an amount equal to 5 percent of the amount of such sale may be waived only by a contract in writing providing for an amount in excess of 5 percent of the amount of such sale. An artist may assign the right to collect the royalty payment provided by this section to another individual or entity. However, the assignment shall not have the
effect of creating a waiver prohibited by this subdivision.
(1)When a work of fine art is sold at an auction or by a gallery, dealer, broker, museum, or other person acting as the agent for the seller the agent shall withhold 5 percent of the amount of the sale, locate the artist and pay the artist.
(2)If the seller or agent is unable to locate and pay the artist within 90 days, an amount equal to 5 percent of the amount of the sale shall be tranferred to the Arts Council.
(3)If a seller or the seller’s agent fails to pay an artist the amount equal to 5 percent of the sale of a work of fine art by the artist or fails to transfer such amount to the Arts Council, the artist may bring an action for damages within three years after the date of sale or one year after the discovery of the sale, whichever is longer. The
prevailing party in any action brought under this paragraph shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees, in an amount as determined by the court.
(4)Moneys received by the council pursuant to this section shall be deposited in an account in the Special Deposit Fund in the State Treasury.
(5)The Arts Council shall attempt to locate any artist for whom money is received pursuant to this section. If the council is unable to locate the artist and the artist does not file a written claim for the money received by the council within seven years of the date of sale of the work of fine art, the right of the artist terminates and such money shall be transferred to the council for use in acquiring fine art pursuant to the Art in Public Buildings program set forth in Chapter 2.1 (commencing with Section 15813) of Part 10b of Division 3 of Title 2, of the Government Code.
(6)Any amounts of money held by any seller or agent for the payment of artists pursuant to this section shall be exempt from enforcement of a money judgment by the creditors of the seller or agent.
(7)Upon the death of an artist, the rights and duties created under this section shall inure to his or her heirs, legatees, or personal representative, until the 20th anniversary of the death of the artist. The provisions of this paragraph shall be applicable only with respect to an artist who dies after January 1, 1983.
(b)Subdivision (a) shall not apply to any of the following:
(1)To the initial sale of a work of fine art where legal title to such work at the time of such initial sale is vested in the artist thereof.
(2)To the resale of a work of fine art for a gross sales price of less than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(3)Except as provided in paragraph (7) of subdivision (a), to a resale after the death of such artist.
(4)To the resale of the work of fine art for a gross sales price less than the purchase price paid by the seller.
(5)To a transfer of a work of fine art which is exchanged for one or more works of fine art or for a combination of cash, other property, and one or more works of fine art where the fair market value of the property exchanged is less than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
(6)To the resale of a work of fine art by an art dealer to a purchaser within 10 years of the initial
sale of the work of fine art by the artist to an art dealer, provided all intervening resales are between art dealers.
(7)To a sale of a work of stained glass artistry where the work has been permanently attached to real property and is sold as part of the sale of the real property to which it is attached.
(c)For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1)“Artist” means the person who creates a work of fine art and who, at the time of resale, is a citizen of the United States, or a resident of the state who has resided in the state for a minimum of two years .
(2)“Fine art” means an original painting, sculpture, or drawing, or an original work of art in glass.
(3)“Art dealer” means a person who is actively and principally engaged in or conducting the business of selling works of fine art for which business such person validly holds a sales tax permit.
(d)This section shall become operative on January 1, 1977, and shall apply to works of fine art created before and after its operative date.
(e)If any provision of this section or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect any other provisions or applications of this section which can be effected, without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this section are severable.
(f)The amendments to this section enacted during the 1981–82 Regular Session of the Legislature shall apply to transfers of works of
fine art, when created before or after January 1, 1983, that occur on or after that date.
Notes of Decisions
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
· cites it 36× “” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
Chuck Close v. Sotheby's, Inc., 894 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2018).
· cites it 8× “Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). If the seller or agent is unable to locate and pay the artist within 90 days, the 5% royalty goes to the California Arts Council.”
Chuck Close v. Sotheby's, Inc., 909 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 2018).
· cites it 10× “Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a)(3). Plaintiffs argue that fees are not available under the CRRA because the effect of our decision was to void the CRRA, including its fee-shifting provision.”
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's, Inc., 178 F. Supp. 3d 974 (C.D. Cal. 2016).
· cites it 9× “” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The right to royalties may not be limited through contract, but it may be expanded beyond the five percent of the sale proceeds.”
Simons v. Horowitz, 151 Cal. App. 3d 834 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 3× “The court entered judgment on October 23, 1980, ordering each member of the defendant class, apart from the two defendants which had appeared on October 10, to “account for and pay, pursuant to California Civil Code section 986, each artist, or the Arts Council if the artist is…”
Elizabeth Flynt v. Rob Bonta, 131 F.4th 918 (9th Cir. 2025).
“3d at 1323 (quoting Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a)). Applying Healy, we concluded that the first part of the law had an impermissible extraterritorial effect because it “regulate[d] sales that take place outside of California” that “ha[d] no necessary connection with the state other…”
Robert H. Jacobs, Inc. v. Westoaks Realtors, Inc., 159 Cal. App. 3d 637 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 2× “) Since Jacobs’ plans are not “fine art,” he is also barred from recovery under California’s codification of droit de suite (art proceeds right), the California resale royalties act (Civ. Code, § 986). 7 This section requires a royalty of 5 percent of the sale amount on any…”
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
· cites it 10× “) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(a) — 2 cases
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
“” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
“) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(a)(1) — 2 cases
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
“” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
“) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(a)(3) — 1 case
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
“) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(b) — 1 case
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
“” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(b)(4) — 1 case
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
“” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(c)(1) — 1 case
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
“) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
— Cal. Civil Code § 986(e) — 2 cases
Sam Francis Found. v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 2015).
“” Cal. Civ. Code § 986 (a). The en banc court held that the Act’s clause regulating sales outside the state of California facially violated the “dormant” Commerce Clause but that the offending provision was severable from the remainder of the Act.”
Est. of Graham v. Sotheby's Inc., 860 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (C.D. Cal. 2012).
“) On October 18, 2011, Plaintiffs — a collection of artists and their heirs — brought the instant Class Action Complaints (the “Complaints”), alleging that Defendants failed to comply with the California Resale Royalties Act (“CRRA”), Cal. Civ.Code § 986. Specifically,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.