California Codes
Cal. Corporations Code § 150 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A corporation is an “affiliate” of, or a corporation is “affiliated” with, another specified corporation if it directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the other specified corporation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Jeremy Revitch v. Directv, LLC, 977 F.3d 713 (9th Cir. 2020).
Jeremy Revitch v. Directv, LLC, 977 F.3d 713 (9th Cir. 2020). “2009) (quoting Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 35 (2002)); see also Cal. Corp. Code § 150 (“A corporation is an ‘affiliate’ of .”
Otay Land Co. v. U.E. Ltd., L.P., 225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 119 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “, Corp. Code, § 150 ["A corporation is an 'affiliate' of .”
Citicorp North Am., Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd., 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000). “4 Corporations Code section 150 defines “affiliate” as follows.”
Namisnak v. Uber Techs., Inc., 315 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “" Cal. Corp. Code § 150 . 1 Uber explains that Uber Technologies, Inc.”
Ferreira v. Uber Tech., Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2023). “Therefore, Rasier is an affiliate of Schleuder and Portier because 22 they are all under common ownership.”
Lowe v. Am. Student Fin. Grp., Inc. (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2020). “” CAL. CORP. CODE § 150. The definition of “affiliate” in the TLPA is consistent with California law.”
James v. Knolls West Post Acute CA4/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2024). “But even assuming the fact of common ownership was established, under Corporations Code section 150, affiliate status depends on common control.”
Xtria L.L.C. v. Int'l Ins. All. Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “" Corp. Code § 150. The essence of an affiliate is control.”
Xtria L.L.C. v. Int'l Ins. All. Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “" Corp. Code § 150. The essence of an affiliate is control.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.